Reframing University and Practitioner Research Partnerships

Abstract This article reframes the potential for partnerships between university researchers and counseling practitioners that yield more applied counseling research. The gap in practitioner research and its resultant fracturing of the counseling field are well documented in the literature. Guiding principles of these partnerships are offered as a method of grounding the relationship based on a case study example between a university researcher and a local counseling training organization. The four primary values that can guide this reframing of practitioner research are the emphasis on practitioner expertise, development of research identity for practitioners and future practitioners, flexibility in data collection and analysis, and establishment of trust between researchers and clinicians. These values address the barriers to practitioner research that are currently explored in the literature. Application of these values led to a successful partnership yielding ample data collection with plans to produce academic articles and new training programs. Exploring the potential for effective practitioner research has the potential to produce more applied research that is currently lacking in the field of counseling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mental Health Counseling
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.47.4.01
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing University and Practitioner Research Partnerships

Julia Conroy, Kristi Perryman
Journal of Mental Health Counseling
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Reframing University and Practitioner Research Partnerships

Julia Conroy, Kristi Perryman
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article reframes the potential for partnerships between university researchers and counseling practitioners that yield more applied counseling research. The gap in practitioner research and its resultant fracturing of the counseling field are well documented in the literature. Guiding principles of these partnerships are offered as a method of grounding the relationship based on a case study example between a university researcher and a local counseling training organization. The four primary values that can guide this reframing of practitioner research are the emphasis on practitioner expertise, development of research identity for practitioners and future practitioners, flexibility in data collection and analysis, and establishment of trust between researchers and clinicians. These values address the barriers to practitioner research that are currently explored in the literature. Application of these values led to a successful partnership yielding ample data collection with plans to produce academic articles and new training programs. Exploring the potential for effective practitioner research has the potential to produce more applied research that is currently lacking in the field of counseling.

Journal of Mental Health CounselingVol. 47(4)
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reframing University and Practitioner Research Partnerships — Julia Conroy, Kristi Perryman · Journal of Mental Health Counseling (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS