Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Comparative Study on Grading Methods and the Technology Acceptance Model

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT has transformed higher education, offering innovative solutions for personalized learning and grading. This study investigates students’ perceptions and acceptance of AI-assisted grading compared to traditional teaching assistant (TA) grading using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The research explores how grading methods and exam formats influence key TAM constructs such as perceived usefulness, ease of use, and behavioral intentions. Findings suggest that mixed exam formats (70% multiple-choice, 30% short-answer) yield the highest acceptance rates for AI-assisted grading, emphasizing the importance of balanced assessment structures. The study highlights the need for human oversight in AI grading and recommends tailored strategies to enhance adoption among diverse student groups. These insights contribute to the evolving discourse on the ethical, practical, and educational implications of AI in academia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20429/amtp.2025.09
Primary Topic
AI and HR Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Comparative Study on Grading Methods and the Technology Acceptance Model

Rasheed Bello
AI and HR Technologies
article

Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Comparative Study on Grading Methods and the Technology Acceptance Model

Rasheed Bello
article en

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT has transformed higher education, offering innovative solutions for personalized learning and grading. This study investigates students’ perceptions and acceptance of AI-assisted grading compared to traditional teaching assistant (TA) grading using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The research explores how grading methods and exam formats influence key TAM constructs such as perceived usefulness, ease of use, and behavioral intentions. Findings suggest that mixed exam formats (70% multiple-choice, 30% short-answer) yield the highest acceptance rates for AI-assisted grading, emphasizing the importance of balanced assessment structures. The study highlights the need for human oversight in AI grading and recommends tailored strategies to enhance adoption among diverse student groups. These insights contribute to the evolving discourse on the ethical, practical, and educational implications of AI in academia.

Washington State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
AI and HR Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Comparative Study on Grading Methods and the Technology Acceptance Model — Rasheed Bello · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS