Dual Interfacial Engineering of Glass Fiber‐Reinforced Composites: Synergistic Enhancement via Hyperbranched Polyester‐Modified Resin and Rigid/Flexible Fiber Coatings

ABSTRACT Glass fiber‐reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites were prepared by hand lay‐up using unsaturated polyester resin (UPR) matrices in which a hyperbranched polyester (HBP) synthesized via a polyethylene glycol (PEG) core route was incorporated. Glass fibers (GFs) were functionalized to create “rigid” (HEA/TDI‐modified, m‐GF) and “flexible” (KH570‐modified, KH570‐GF) interfaces. HBP‐modified UPR composites exhibited enhanced tensile, flexural, and impact strengths by 62.2%, 17.5%, and 95.0%, respectively, versus unmodified counterparts. Introducing the rigid m‐GF interface further amplified these improvements, achieving strength gains of 96.1% (tensile), 90.9% (flexural), and 80.4% (impact). The flexible KH570‐GF interface yielded the most pronounced synergistic effect: the optimum system (KH570‐GF + 5 wt% HBP) achieved a tensile strength of 336.8 MPa (a 113% increase), a flexural strength of 622.1 MPa (93.6% increase), and an impact strength of 142.2 kJ m −2 (187% increase) relative to the baseline GF/UPR composite. Dynamic mechanical analysis confirmed increased glass transition temperatures, indicating enhanced thermal stability from improved crosslinking. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated reduced fiber‐matrix debonding and suppressed crack propagation in the modified systems. The rigid interface primarily enhanced load transfer efficiency, whereas the flexible interface promoted energy absorption via interfacial slippage. These findings illustrate that independent tailoring of rigid or flexible interfaces provides distinct pathways for performance optimization, effectively overcoming the traditional strength–toughness trade‐off in GFRPs and offering customizable solutions for aerospace and structural applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.70486
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual Interfacial Engineering of Glass Fiber‐Reinforced Composites: Synergistic Enhancement via Hyperbranched Polyester‐Modified Resin and Rigid/Flexible Fiber Coatings

Huiping Lin, Yiqiang Wu, Shanwei Chen, Ran Li et al.
1 citations
Polymer Composites
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
0.61
article

Dual Interfacial Engineering of Glass Fiber‐Reinforced Composites: Synergistic Enhancement via Hyperbranched Polyester‐Modified Resin and Rigid/Flexible Fiber Coatings

Huiping Lin, Yiqiang Wu, Shanwei Chen, Ran Li, Wenbin Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Glass fiber‐reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites were prepared by hand lay‐up using unsaturated polyester resin (UPR) matrices in which a hyperbranched polyester (HBP) synthesized via a polyethylene glycol (PEG) core route was incorporated. Glass fibers (GFs) were functionalized to create “rigid” (HEA/TDI‐modified, m‐GF) and “flexible” (KH570‐modified, KH570‐GF) interfaces. HBP‐modified UPR composites exhibited enhanced tensile, flexural, and impact strengths by 62.2%, 17.5%, and 95.0%, respectively, versus unmodified counterparts. Introducing the rigid m‐GF interface further amplified these improvements, achieving strength gains of 96.1% (tensile), 90.9% (flexural), and 80.4% (impact). The flexible KH570‐GF interface yielded the most pronounced synergistic effect: the optimum system (KH570‐GF + 5 wt% HBP) achieved a tensile strength of 336.8 MPa (a 113% increase), a flexural strength of 622.1 MPa (93.6% increase), and an impact strength of 142.2 kJ m −2 (187% increase) relative to the baseline GF/UPR composite. Dynamic mechanical analysis confirmed increased glass transition temperatures, indicating enhanced thermal stability from improved crosslinking. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated reduced fiber‐matrix debonding and suppressed crack propagation in the modified systems. The rigid interface primarily enhanced load transfer efficiency, whereas the flexible interface promoted energy absorption via interfacial slippage. These findings illustrate that independent tailoring of rigid or flexible interfaces provides distinct pathways for performance optimization, effectively overcoming the traditional strength–toughness trade‐off in GFRPs and offering customizable solutions for aerospace and structural applications.

Polymer CompositesVol. 47(6)
Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CN), Central South University (CN), China Electronics Standardization Institute (CN), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
0.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.