Natural-history traits suspected behind interspecific variations of bark- and wood-boring beetles in response to trap size and design

The performances of traps used for pest monitoring are not well understood. Variable trap sizes and shapes make cross-comparisons difficult. We tested with four Scolytinae species (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) a set of traps of the same model (fan-traps) in four sizes (310, 536, 832.5, 1,200 cm<sup>2</sup>), and a larger trap with another design (a four-vane trap, 4,500 cm<sup>2</sup>). A significantly linear relationship was observed between trap sizes and catches for Pityogenes chalcographus, but the catches of Ips typographus, Trypodendron lineatum and T. signatum tapered off. In the literature, comparable tapering-off effects were observed with Xyleborus glabratus (Scolytinae) and Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera, Buprestidae), but a significant linear response with increasing trap size was observed with Trypodendron lineatum and T. rufitarsus. In another test, beetle landing behaviour was measured on a 1 m<sup>2</sup> glued panel baited with lineatin (the Trypodendron spp. pheromone) and ethanol (a host kairomone). The landing densities of Trypodendron spp. did not increase with the distance to the attractants whilst Anisandrus dispar landed in very significantly higher densities far from the attractants. Species using pheromones to locate mate and host appear to land closer to the source of attractants than species responding to kairomones for locating a suitable host.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16511-6
Primary Topic
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Natural-history traits suspected behind interspecific variations of bark- and wood-boring beetles in response to trap size and design

Séverine Hasbroucq, Jean‐Claude Grégoire, Emilio Caiti
Scientific Reports
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
article

Natural-history traits suspected behind interspecific variations of bark- and wood-boring beetles in response to trap size and design

Séverine Hasbroucq, Jean‐Claude Grégoire, Emilio Caiti
article en

Abstract

The performances of traps used for pest monitoring are not well understood. Variable trap sizes and shapes make cross-comparisons difficult. We tested with four Scolytinae species (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) a set of traps of the same model (fan-traps) in four sizes (310, 536, 832.5, 1,200 cm<sup>2</sup>), and a larger trap with another design (a four-vane trap, 4,500 cm<sup>2</sup>). A significantly linear relationship was observed between trap sizes and catches for Pityogenes chalcographus, but the catches of Ips typographus, Trypodendron lineatum and T. signatum tapered off. In the literature, comparable tapering-off effects were observed with Xyleborus glabratus (Scolytinae) and Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera, Buprestidae), but a significant linear response with increasing trap size was observed with Trypodendron lineatum and T. rufitarsus. In another test, beetle landing behaviour was measured on a 1 m<sup>2</sup> glued panel baited with lineatin (the Trypodendron spp. pheromone) and ethanol (a host kairomone). The landing densities of Trypodendron spp. did not increase with the distance to the attractants whilst Anisandrus dispar landed in very significantly higher densities far from the attractants. Species using pheromones to locate mate and host appear to land closer to the source of attractants than species responding to kairomones for locating a suitable host.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.