On and off-the-record correction practices: A survey-based study of how chemistry researchers react to errors

To improve science correction, the study suggests that online platforms and repositories can facilitate the transition from off-the-record discussions to on-the-record initiatives, ultimately feeding into the public record.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accountability in Research
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2564106
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On and off-the-record correction practices: A survey-based study of how chemistry researchers react to errors

Frédérique Bordignon
1 citations
Accountability in Research
Academic integrity and plagiarism
2.37
article

On and off-the-record correction practices: A survey-based study of how chemistry researchers react to errors

Frédérique Bordignon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To improve science correction, the study suggests that online platforms and repositories can facilitate the transition from off-the-record discussions to on-the-record initiatives, ultimately feeding into the public record.

Accountability in ResearchVol. 33(4)
École nationale des ponts et chaussées (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
2.37
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.