A Model of How LGBTQ+ Youth Suicide Attempts Occur: Empirically Linking LGBTQ+ Specific vs. Non-Specific Factors

This research delves into the processes and personal meanings behind suicide attempts among LGBTQ+ youth in Switzerland, aiming to distinguish between LGBTQ+-specific and general factors. Conducted between 2021 and 2024, the study involved interviews with LGBTQ+ individuals aged 14-28 who had attempted suicide, as well as with people from their social environment (family members, friends, etc.) if possible, using Grounded Theory Methodology. The participant pool consisted of 41 individuals: 7 bisexual/lesbian cis women, 4 bisexual/gay cis men, 15 trans/non-binary individuals, 3 heterosexual cis people; and 12 from their social environment. The results indicated that sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) influenced the suicidal processes in different ways. For some participants, SOGI was a central factor, with significant issues such as lack of acceptance and obstacles to gender-affirming care being prominent. For others, suicidality was primarily linked to non-SOGI factors such as unsafe family environments or sexualized violence, with SOGI-related issues intensifying these situations. Additionally, a mixed type was identified where both SOGI and non-SOGI factors were both equally influential. The study underscores the need for customized health promotion, suicide prevention, and early intervention strategies that address the varied types of suicidal processes among LGBTQ+ youth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Homosexuality
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2563799
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Model of How LGBTQ+ Youth Suicide Attempts Occur: Empirically Linking LGBTQ+ Specific vs. Non-Specific Factors

Amaelle Gavin, Laurent Michaud, Céline Bourquin, Tobias Kuhnert et al.
Journal of Homosexuality
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

A Model of How LGBTQ+ Youth Suicide Attempts Occur: Empirically Linking LGBTQ+ Specific vs. Non-Specific Factors

Amaelle Gavin, Laurent Michaud, Céline Bourquin, Tobias Kuhnert, Niolyne Jasmin Bomolo, Stephan Kupferschmid, Andreas Pfister, Nikola Koschmieder, Raphaël Guillet
article en

Abstract

This research delves into the processes and personal meanings behind suicide attempts among LGBTQ+ youth in Switzerland, aiming to distinguish between LGBTQ+-specific and general factors. Conducted between 2021 and 2024, the study involved interviews with LGBTQ+ individuals aged 14-28 who had attempted suicide, as well as with people from their social environment (family members, friends, etc.) if possible, using Grounded Theory Methodology. The participant pool consisted of 41 individuals: 7 bisexual/lesbian cis women, 4 bisexual/gay cis men, 15 trans/non-binary individuals, 3 heterosexual cis people; and 12 from their social environment. The results indicated that sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) influenced the suicidal processes in different ways. For some participants, SOGI was a central factor, with significant issues such as lack of acceptance and obstacles to gender-affirming care being prominent. For others, suicidality was primarily linked to non-SOGI factors such as unsafe family environments or sexualized violence, with SOGI-related issues intensifying these situations. Additionally, a mixed type was identified where both SOGI and non-SOGI factors were both equally influential. The study underscores the need for customized health promotion, suicide prevention, and early intervention strategies that address the varied types of suicidal processes among LGBTQ+ youth.

Journal of Homosexuality
Privatklinik Meiringen (CH), Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (CH), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.