Data from ctDNA as a Molecular Biomarker in the Phase II Trial of Imatinib plus Binimetinib in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>This study investigated factors that affected ctDNA detection and ctDNA as a molecular biomarker in a phase II trial of imatinib and binimetinib in newly diagnosed advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor, including patients exposed to imatinib within 4 weeks of trial enrollment.</p>Experimental Design:<p>Plasma and tumor tissue samples were collected at baseline, during treatment, and upon progression. DNAs extracted from plasma and tumor tissue were analyzed using genomic assays, Memorial Sloan Kettering Analysis of Circulating cfDNA to Evaluate Somatic Status and Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets, respectively. Sequenced ctDNA detection of the primary oncogenic driver was determined and correlated with clinical characteristics.</p>Results:<p>Patients (<i>n</i> = 31) included in this analysis had <i>KIT</i> mutations (<i>n</i> = 29, 94%) and metastatic disease (<i>n</i> = 24, 77%) and achieved the best response of partial response (<i>n</i> = 22, 71%), stable disease (<i>n</i> = 8, 26%), or progressive disease (<i>n</i> = 1, 3%). Sixteen patients (52%) were exposed to imatinib at baseline. The ctDNA detection rate of the primary oncogenic driver at baseline was 39% (<i>n</i> = 12/31) and was significantly more likely in patients who were treatment-naïve (<i>n</i> = 15) or had ≤4.2 weeks of treatment (<i>n</i> = 8) than in those otherwise (48% vs. 13%; <i>P</i> value = 0.004). Baseline ctDNA detection did not correlate with tumor burden or stage. The ctDNA serial analysis of the primary oncogenic driver paralleled and sometimes preceded radiographic response. ctDNA detected resistance mutations in <i>KIT</i> (<i>n</i> = 4). Active treatment influenced the detection of secondary <i>KIT</i> alterations in one patient.</p>Conclusions:<p>Active therapy at the time of ctDNA collection negatively affected the ability to detect primary and secondary <i>KIT</i> alterations in sequenced ctDNA from patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor. ctDNA responses may precede radiographic responses and merit further investigation.</p></div>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.c.8065157
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data from ctDNA as a Molecular Biomarker in the Phase II Trial of Imatinib plus Binimetinib in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Li‐Xuan Qin, Viswatej Avutu, Ping Chi, Lauren B. Banks et al.
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
article

Data from ctDNA as a Molecular Biomarker in the Phase II Trial of Imatinib plus Binimetinib in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Li‐Xuan Qin, Viswatej Avutu, Ping Chi, Lauren B. Banks, Aimeé M. Crago, Sinchun Hwang, Maysun Hasan, William D. Tap, Mrinal M. Gounder, Michael F. Berger, Vivian E. Strong, Edmund K. Bartlett, Jason E. Chan, Mark A. Dickson, Evan Rosenbaum, Ronak H. Shah, Brian R. Untch, Martina Bradić, Sujana Movva, Mary Louise Keohan, Robert G. Maki, Maria Lapshina, Samuel Singer, Karthigayini Sivaprakasam, Ciara M. Kelly, Cristina R. Antonescu, Sandra P. D’Angelo, Sara Saunds
article en

Abstract

<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>This study investigated factors that affected ctDNA detection and ctDNA as a molecular biomarker in a phase II trial of imatinib and binimetinib in newly diagnosed advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor, including patients exposed to imatinib within 4 weeks of trial enrollment.</p>Experimental Design:<p>Plasma and tumor tissue samples were collected at baseline, during treatment, and upon progression. DNAs extracted from plasma and tumor tissue were analyzed using genomic assays, Memorial Sloan Kettering Analysis of Circulating cfDNA to Evaluate Somatic Status and Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets, respectively. Sequenced ctDNA detection of the primary oncogenic driver was determined and correlated with clinical characteristics.</p>Results:<p>Patients (<i>n</i> = 31) included in this analysis had <i>KIT</i> mutations (<i>n</i> = 29, 94%) and metastatic disease (<i>n</i> = 24, 77%) and achieved the best response of partial response (<i>n</i> = 22, 71%), stable disease (<i>n</i> = 8, 26%), or progressive disease (<i>n</i> = 1, 3%). Sixteen patients (52%) were exposed to imatinib at baseline. The ctDNA detection rate of the primary oncogenic driver at baseline was 39% (<i>n</i> = 12/31) and was significantly more likely in patients who were treatment-naïve (<i>n</i> = 15) or had ≤4.2 weeks of treatment (<i>n</i> = 8) than in those otherwise (48% vs. 13%; <i>P</i> value = 0.004). Baseline ctDNA detection did not correlate with tumor burden or stage. The ctDNA serial analysis of the primary oncogenic driver paralleled and sometimes preceded radiographic response. ctDNA detected resistance mutations in <i>KIT</i> (<i>n</i> = 4). Active treatment influenced the detection of secondary <i>KIT</i> alterations in one patient.</p>Conclusions:<p>Active therapy at the time of ctDNA collection negatively affected the ability to detect primary and secondary <i>KIT</i> alterations in sequenced ctDNA from patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor. ctDNA responses may precede radiographic responses and merit further investigation.</p></div>

Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.