Applicability Domain of Peroxidase Peptide Reactivity Assay (PPRA): Chemical Structure Analysis and Grouping of Peptide Depletion Patterns

Skin sensitization is a critical endpoint in human safety risk assessment of chemicals. Risk assessment approaches have evolved, and the field has seen a shift toward adopting new approach methods (NAMs) instead of relying solely on animal or human data. While the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) is considered one of the NAMs of key event (KE) 1 within the OECD guideline 497 in combination with other NAMs for predicting skin sensitization hazard or potency, the assay is limited by the lack of activation features for pre-/pro-haptens. To address this, the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay (PPRA) was developed, utilizing horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to facilitate the oxidation and activation of test substances. However, limited information is available on the chemical substrate scope and applicability domain of the PPRA. In this study, we investigated the substrate scope of HRP to gain insights into the mechanism of the PPRA. Based on our analysis, the substrates of HRP include substituted phenols (or aromatic alcohols) and aniline (or aromatic amines) as well as their O- or N-alkyl derivatives. By considering the substrate scope of HRP, depletion patterns and mechanisms in the DPRA/PPRA, and the underlying chemistry of the assays, we categorized chemicals into five distinct chemical groups with unique structural features and depletion patterns in the DPRA/PPRA. This study elucidates the relationship between chemical structures, assay results of the DPRA and PPRA, and their applicability for predicting the skin sensitization potential. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the predictive capabilities of the PPRA and provide valuable insights for incorporating PPRA into next-generation risk assessments (NGRAs).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00321
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applicability Domain of Peroxidase Peptide Reactivity Assay (PPRA): Chemical Structure Analysis and Grouping of Peptide Depletion Patterns

I Schember, Kim Ellingson, Petra Kern, Isabelle Lee et al.
1 citations
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
2.00
article

Applicability Domain of Peroxidase Peptide Reactivity Assay (PPRA): Chemical Structure Analysis and Grouping of Peptide Depletion Patterns

I Schember, Kim Ellingson, Petra Kern, Isabelle Lee, Mingjie Zhang, Gang Yan, Cindy A. Ryan, G. Frank Gerberick
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Skin sensitization is a critical endpoint in human safety risk assessment of chemicals. Risk assessment approaches have evolved, and the field has seen a shift toward adopting new approach methods (NAMs) instead of relying solely on animal or human data. While the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) is considered one of the NAMs of key event (KE) 1 within the OECD guideline 497 in combination with other NAMs for predicting skin sensitization hazard or potency, the assay is limited by the lack of activation features for pre-/pro-haptens. To address this, the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay (PPRA) was developed, utilizing horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to facilitate the oxidation and activation of test substances. However, limited information is available on the chemical substrate scope and applicability domain of the PPRA. In this study, we investigated the substrate scope of HRP to gain insights into the mechanism of the PPRA. Based on our analysis, the substrates of HRP include substituted phenols (or aromatic alcohols) and aniline (or aromatic amines) as well as their O- or N-alkyl derivatives. By considering the substrate scope of HRP, depletion patterns and mechanisms in the DPRA/PPRA, and the underlying chemistry of the assays, we categorized chemicals into five distinct chemical groups with unique structural features and depletion patterns in the DPRA/PPRA. This study elucidates the relationship between chemical structures, assay results of the DPRA and PPRA, and their applicability for predicting the skin sensitization potential. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the predictive capabilities of the PPRA and provide valuable insights for incorporating PPRA into next-generation risk assessments (NGRAs).

Chemical Research in ToxicologyVol. 38(10)
West Chester University (US), Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (US), Cortech Solutions (United States) (US), Procter & Gamble (India) (IN), Procter & Gamble (Italy) (IT), Procter & Gamble (United Kingdom) (GB), Clinical Solutions (US), Forest Stewards Guild (US), 21c Consultancy (United Kingdom) (GB), Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
2.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.