Comparative study of CO₂ nanobubbles and macrobubbles: Effects on water chemistry, microalgal growth, and carbon utilization

Algal biotechnology presents a cost-effective approach for simultaneous carbon dioxide (CO₂) capture and bioproduct generation. However, conventional gas delivery approaches (e.g., macro and micro-bubbles) suffer from low gas-liquid mass transfer efficiency (K<sub>L</sub>·a) and CO<sub>2</sub> utilization. This study investigated the aqueous properties of CO₂ nanobubbles and impacts on the CO<sub>2</sub> mass transfer, utilization, and microalgal growth. Results revealed that direct injection of CO<sub>2</sub> nanobubbles in DI water achieved rapid CO<sub>2</sub> saturation (1.48 ± 0.08 g·L<sup>-1</sup>) and nanobubble density (1.5 × 10<sup>8</sup> particles·mL<sup>-1</sup>) within 1 minute. By contrast, the circulation mode produced a higher nanobubbles concentration (2.6 × 10<sup>8</sup> particles·mL<sup>-1</sup>) after 20 min with a similar dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Accordingly, the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (K<sub>L</sub>·a) of CO<sub>2</sub> nanobubbles in DI water reached 12.41 ± 3.49 h<sup>-1</sup> (circulation mode) and 18.91 ± 7.68 h<sup>-1</sup> (direct mode), exceeding that of macrobubbles (10.18 ± 2.38 h<sup>-1</sup>). Compared to macrobubbles, the use of CO<sub>2</sub> nanobubbles in Scenedesmus obliquus cultivation increased biomass by 10.11 ± 0.01% over 14 days and garnered carbon utilization efficiency (CUE) to 27.86 ± 0.63%, supported by the enhanced CO<sub>2</sub> mass transfer or carbon transfer efficiency. These findings highlight the potential of nanobubble technology in algal biotechnology applications and global CO<sub>2</sub> emission mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Research
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124714
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of CO₂ nanobubbles and macrobubbles: Effects on water chemistry, microalgal growth, and carbon utilization

Xuezhi Zhang, Y.T. Li, Yi‐Ying Lee, Taha F. Marhaba et al.
4 citations
Water Research
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
3.27
article

Comparative study of CO₂ nanobubbles and macrobubbles: Effects on water chemistry, microalgal growth, and carbon utilization

Xuezhi Zhang, Y.T. Li, Yi‐Ying Lee, Taha F. Marhaba, Wen Zhang, Yihan Zhang, Xia Li, Shan Xue, Jun Wei, Sowmya Atukuri
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Algal biotechnology presents a cost-effective approach for simultaneous carbon dioxide (CO₂) capture and bioproduct generation. However, conventional gas delivery approaches (e.g., macro and micro-bubbles) suffer from low gas-liquid mass transfer efficiency (K<sub>L</sub>·a) and CO<sub>2</sub> utilization. This study investigated the aqueous properties of CO₂ nanobubbles and impacts on the CO<sub>2</sub> mass transfer, utilization, and microalgal growth. Results revealed that direct injection of CO<sub>2</sub> nanobubbles in DI water achieved rapid CO<sub>2</sub> saturation (1.48 ± 0.08 g·L<sup>-1</sup>) and nanobubble density (1.5 × 10<sup>8</sup> particles·mL<sup>-1</sup>) within 1 minute. By contrast, the circulation mode produced a higher nanobubbles concentration (2.6 × 10<sup>8</sup> particles·mL<sup>-1</sup>) after 20 min with a similar dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Accordingly, the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (K<sub>L</sub>·a) of CO<sub>2</sub> nanobubbles in DI water reached 12.41 ± 3.49 h<sup>-1</sup> (circulation mode) and 18.91 ± 7.68 h<sup>-1</sup> (direct mode), exceeding that of macrobubbles (10.18 ± 2.38 h<sup>-1</sup>). Compared to macrobubbles, the use of CO<sub>2</sub> nanobubbles in Scenedesmus obliquus cultivation increased biomass by 10.11 ± 0.01% over 14 days and garnered carbon utilization efficiency (CUE) to 27.86 ± 0.63%, supported by the enhanced CO<sub>2</sub> mass transfer or carbon transfer efficiency. These findings highlight the potential of nanobubble technology in algal biotechnology applications and global CO<sub>2</sub> emission mitigation.

Water ResearchVol. 288(Pt B)
New Jersey Institute of Technology (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Hydrobiology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
3.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.