Interactive, Image-Based Modules as a Complement to Prosection-Based Anatomy Laboratories: Multicohort Evaluation (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> As medical and allied health curricula adapt to increasing time constraints, ethical considerations, and resource limitations, digital innovations are becoming vital supplements to donor-based anatomy instruction. While prior studies have examined the effectiveness of prosection versus dissection and the role of digital tools in anatomy learning, few resources align interactive digital modules directly with hands-on prosection experiences. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This project addresses that gap by introducing an integrated, curriculum-aligned platform for self-guided cadaveric learning. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We created Anatomy Interactives, a web-based laboratory manual structured to complement prosection laboratories for MD, DPT, and PA students. Modules were developed using iSpring Suite (iSpring Solutions Incorporated) and included interactive labeled images, donor photographs, and quiz-style self-assessments. Learners engaged with modules before, during, or after laboratory sessions. PA/DPT and MD students completed postcourse surveys evaluating module use and perceived impact. MD student examination scores from a 2023 cohort (no module access) were compared to a 2024 cohort (with access) to evaluate effectiveness. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> A total of 147 students completed the survey (31 PA/DPT and 116 MD). The majority reported using modules for 1-2 hours per week and found them helpful for both written and laboratory examinations. MD students in the 2024 cohort performed better on all 3 examinations compared to the 2023 cohort, with 2 examination median differences reaching statistical significance (Mann-Whitney U, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&amp;lt;.001). Qualitative feedback highlighted accessibility, content reinforcement, and user engagement as key benefits. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Interactive modules integrated with prosection laboratories enhanced learner engagement and performance. This hybrid digital-donor model shows promise for scalable, learner-centered gross anatomy education. </sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.85028
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interactive, Image-Based Modules as a Complement to Prosection-Based Anatomy Laboratories: Multicohort Evaluation (Preprint)

Caroline Sumner, Sami L. Case, Steven E. Franklin, Kristen M. Platt
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Interactive, Image-Based Modules as a Complement to Prosection-Based Anatomy Laboratories: Multicohort Evaluation (Preprint)

Caroline Sumner, Sami L. Case, Steven E. Franklin, Kristen M. Platt
article en

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> As medical and allied health curricula adapt to increasing time constraints, ethical considerations, and resource limitations, digital innovations are becoming vital supplements to donor-based anatomy instruction. While prior studies have examined the effectiveness of prosection versus dissection and the role of digital tools in anatomy learning, few resources align interactive digital modules directly with hands-on prosection experiences. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This project addresses that gap by introducing an integrated, curriculum-aligned platform for self-guided cadaveric learning. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We created Anatomy Interactives, a web-based laboratory manual structured to complement prosection laboratories for MD, DPT, and PA students. Modules were developed using iSpring Suite (iSpring Solutions Incorporated) and included interactive labeled images, donor photographs, and quiz-style self-assessments. Learners engaged with modules before, during, or after laboratory sessions. PA/DPT and MD students completed postcourse surveys evaluating module use and perceived impact. MD student examination scores from a 2023 cohort (no module access) were compared to a 2024 cohort (with access) to evaluate effectiveness. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> A total of 147 students completed the survey (31 PA/DPT and 116 MD). The majority reported using modules for 1-2 hours per week and found them helpful for both written and laboratory examinations. MD students in the 2024 cohort performed better on all 3 examinations compared to the 2023 cohort, with 2 examination median differences reaching statistical significance (Mann-Whitney U, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&amp;lt;.001). Qualitative feedback highlighted accessibility, content reinforcement, and user engagement as key benefits. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Interactive modules integrated with prosection laboratories enhanced learner engagement and performance. This hybrid digital-donor model shows promise for scalable, learner-centered gross anatomy education. </sec>

Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.