Why and How we Need to Involve Background Noise in Audiological Assessment

This paper explores the importance of assessing speech recognition in noise for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, highlighting its relevance in audiological rehabilitation. Traditional assessments like pure tone and speech audiometry in quiet often fail to address patients' real-world listening challenges, particularly in noisy environments. Studies using the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) in Australia and Belgium reveal that speech in noise is a common rehabilitation goal, though its prioritization varies by region. The MarkeTrak survey further emphasizes that hearing aid users report significantly higher satisfaction in noisy situations compared to non-users. Despite its clinical relevance, speech in noise testing faces implementation barriers. The Acceptable Noise Level (ANL) test and Speech Audiometry in Noise (SPIN) are discussed, with findings showing that the type and spectral characteristics of background noise significantly affect test outcomes. Specifically, speech-weighted noise yields more reliable and representative results. The paper concludes by recommending the inclusion of speech in noise testing in audiological assessments, using speech-weighted noise or babble matched to the long-term spectrum of the speech material, in line with ISO standard on speech audiometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Research Archives
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i9.6941
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why and How we Need to Involve Background Noise in Audiological Assessment

Mark Laureyns, Federica Di Berardino, Melinda F. Bryan
Medical Research Archives
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Why and How we Need to Involve Background Noise in Audiological Assessment

Mark Laureyns, Federica Di Berardino, Melinda F. Bryan
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the importance of assessing speech recognition in noise for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, highlighting its relevance in audiological rehabilitation. Traditional assessments like pure tone and speech audiometry in quiet often fail to address patients' real-world listening challenges, particularly in noisy environments. Studies using the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) in Australia and Belgium reveal that speech in noise is a common rehabilitation goal, though its prioritization varies by region. The MarkeTrak survey further emphasizes that hearing aid users report significantly higher satisfaction in noisy situations compared to non-users. Despite its clinical relevance, speech in noise testing faces implementation barriers. The Acceptable Noise Level (ANL) test and Speech Audiometry in Noise (SPIN) are discussed, with findings showing that the type and spectral characteristics of background noise significantly affect test outcomes. Specifically, speech-weighted noise yields more reliable and representative results. The paper concludes by recommending the inclusion of speech in noise testing in audiological assessments, using speech-weighted noise or babble matched to the long-term spectrum of the speech material, in line with ISO standard on speech audiometry.

Medical Research ArchivesVol. 13(9)
Thomas More University (US), Louisiana Tech University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why and How we Need to Involve Background Noise in Audiological Assessment — Mark Laureyns, Federica Di Berardino, et al. · Medical Research Archives (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS