Comparative Evaluation of SNO and Double Difference Calibration Methods for FY-3D MERSI TIR Bands Using MODIS/Aqua as Reference

Radiometric consistency across satellite platforms is fundamental to producing high-quality Climate Data Records (CDRs). Because different cross-calibration methods have distinct advantages and limitations, comparative evaluation is necessary to ensure record accuracy. This study presents a comparative assessment of two widely applied calibration approaches—Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (SNO) and Double Difference (DD)—for the thermal infrared (TIR) bands of FY-3D MERSI. MODIS/Aqua serves as the reference sensor, while radiative transfer simulations driven by ERA5 inputs are generated with the Advanced Radiative Transfer Modeling System (ARMS) to support the analysis. The results show that SNO performs effectively when matchup samples are sufficiently large and globally representative but is less applicable under sparse temporal sampling or orbital drift. In contrast, the DD method consistently achieves higher calibration accuracy for MERSI Bands 24 and 25 under clear-sky conditions. It reduces mean biases from ~−0.5 K to within ±0.1 K and lowers RMSE from ~0.6 K to 0.3–0.4 K during 2021–2022. Under cloudy conditions, DD tends to overcorrect because coefficients derived from clear-sky simulations are not directly transferable to cloud-covered scenes, whereas SNO remains more stable though less precise. Overall, the results suggest that the two methods exhibit complementary strengths, with DD being preferable for high-accuracy calibration in clear-sky scenarios and SNO offering greater stability across variable atmospheric conditions. Future work will validate both methods under varied surface and atmospheric conditions and extend their use to additional sensors and spectral bands.