BAKE: a novel framework for iterative security design for identifying criminally-exploitable vulnerabilities in biotechnology products

Emerging "in-body" monitoring, such as via ingestible devices, promises the future of personalised health, yet discussions of crime and security implications remain of low priority. Here, we develop and deploy the scenario building of the Delphi process and the prototyping of the hackathon through a hybrid hackathon Delphi framework that we have labelled "BAKE". The aim of BAKE is to capture insight from experts regarding the risks posed by these devices; and to produce evidence for the utility of the model as a mechanism to identify at an early stage of design/development, criminally-exploitable vulnerabilities in biotechnology (bio-electronic devices), especially medical products/services. Findings from four expert groups include the identification of four crime forms (e.g., corporate exploitation, data breaches). Five secure by design principles (e.g., end-to-end encryption) and four governance mechanisms (e.g., independent body) were recognised. Four stakeholders were identified (e.g., technical, advocates for equitable treatment). Results indicate that the inclusion of non-traditional experts and early career researchers within the hackathon model can allow the identification of highly challenging threats within the cyber-physical device system. We demonstrated that hosting a hackathon with an embedded Delphi process can instigate secure by design thinking earlier in the product development life cycle of any emerging technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crime Science
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-025-00256-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BAKE: a novel framework for iterative security design for identifying criminally-exploitable vulnerabilities in biotechnology products

Mariam Elgabry, Paul Ekblom, Darren Nesbeth, Shane D. Johnson
1 citations
Crime Science
Biomedical and Engineering Education
0.67
article

BAKE: a novel framework for iterative security design for identifying criminally-exploitable vulnerabilities in biotechnology products

Mariam Elgabry, Paul Ekblom, Darren Nesbeth, Shane D. Johnson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Emerging "in-body" monitoring, such as via ingestible devices, promises the future of personalised health, yet discussions of crime and security implications remain of low priority. Here, we develop and deploy the scenario building of the Delphi process and the prototyping of the hackathon through a hybrid hackathon Delphi framework that we have labelled "BAKE". The aim of BAKE is to capture insight from experts regarding the risks posed by these devices; and to produce evidence for the utility of the model as a mechanism to identify at an early stage of design/development, criminally-exploitable vulnerabilities in biotechnology (bio-electronic devices), especially medical products/services. Findings from four expert groups include the identification of four crime forms (e.g., corporate exploitation, data breaches). Five secure by design principles (e.g., end-to-end encryption) and four governance mechanisms (e.g., independent body) were recognised. Four stakeholders were identified (e.g., technical, advocates for equitable treatment). Results indicate that the inclusion of non-traditional experts and early career researchers within the hackathon model can allow the identification of highly challenging threats within the cyber-physical device system. We demonstrated that hosting a hackathon with an embedded Delphi process can instigate secure by design thinking earlier in the product development life cycle of any emerging technology.

Crime ScienceVol. 14(1)
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Biochemical Society (GB), International Institute for Strategic Studies (GB), University College London (GB), University of the Arts London (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.