Relationship between 2D and 3D galaxy stellar mass and correlations with halo mass

Abstract Recent studies suggest that the stars in the outer regions of massive galaxies trace halo mass better than the inner regions and that an annular stellar mass provides a low scatter method of selecting galaxy clusters. However, we can only observe galaxies as projected two-dimensional objects on the sky. In this paper, we use a sample of simulated galaxies with stellar mass M* > 10 11.2 M ⊙ and z = 0.4 from TNG300 of the IllustrisTNG project to study how well galaxy stellar mass profiles in three dimensions correlate with halo mass, and what effects arise when observationally projecting stellar profiles into two dimensions. We compare 2D and 3D outer stellar mass selections and find that they have similar performance as halo mass proxies and that, surprisingly, a 2D selection sometimes has marginally better performance with a 0.2 dex scatter of halo mass at given stellar mass in the best case. We also investigate whether the weak lensing profiles around galaxies selected by 2D outer stellar mass suffer from projection effects. We find that the lensing profiles of samples selected by 2D and 3D definitions are nearly identical, suggesting that the 2D selection does not create a bias. These findings underscore the promise of using outer stellar mass as a tool for identifying galaxy clusters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/10/014
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship between 2D and 3D galaxy stellar mass and correlations with halo mass

Carlo Cannarozzo, T. Jeltema, M. Gatti, Yifei Luo et al.
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Relationship between 2D and 3D galaxy stellar mass and correlations with halo mass

Carlo Cannarozzo, T. Jeltema, M. Gatti, Yifei Luo, Benedikt Diemer, Katya Leidig, Song Huang, Alexie Leauthaud, Sven Heydenreich, Conghao Zhou, Shuo 朔 Xu 许
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent studies suggest that the stars in the outer regions of massive galaxies trace halo mass better than the inner regions and that an annular stellar mass provides a low scatter method of selecting galaxy clusters. However, we can only observe galaxies as projected two-dimensional objects on the sky. In this paper, we use a sample of simulated galaxies with stellar mass M* > 10 11.2 M ⊙ and z = 0.4 from TNG300 of the IllustrisTNG project to study how well galaxy stellar mass profiles in three dimensions correlate with halo mass, and what effects arise when observationally projecting stellar profiles into two dimensions. We compare 2D and 3D outer stellar mass selections and find that they have similar performance as halo mass proxies and that, surprisingly, a 2D selection sometimes has marginally better performance with a 0.2 dex scatter of halo mass at given stellar mass in the best case. We also investigate whether the weak lensing profiles around galaxies selected by 2D outer stellar mass suffer from projection effects. We find that the lensing profiles of samples selected by 2D and 3D definitions are nearly identical, suggesting that the 2D selection does not create a bias. These findings underscore the promise of using outer stellar mass as a tool for identifying galaxy clusters.

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsVol. 2025(10)
New York University Abu Dhabi (AE), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), University of Chicago (US), Santa Cruz County Office of Education (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.