Current status and solutions for AI ethics in ophthalmology: a bibliometric analysis

Ophthalmology, an early adopter of medical artificial intelligence (AI), has made significant advancements, but ethical discussions limited. This bibliometric analysis reviewed 498 publications from Web of Science and Scopus (2000-2023) to explore the evolution, status, thematic trends, data modalities and their ethical focus, and solutions in ophthalmic AI ethics. Ophthalmology ranks second in medical AI ethics, with major contributors from the United States (US), China, the United Kingdom (UK), Singapore and India. Ethical concerns focus on privacy, fairness, and transparency. Ethical priorities differ by modality with fundus imaging (59.4%) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) (30.9%) as the most common. Most studies (78.3%) address ethics in diagnostic algorithm development, while only 11.5% directly target ethical concerns, though this focus is increasing. This study highlights the need for AI technologies and guidelines to address ethical challenges in ophthalmology, offering a future direction for research and innovation in medical AI governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01976-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current status and solutions for AI ethics in ophthalmology: a bibliometric analysis

Lingyi Liang, Yahan Yang, Yu‐Chun Lin, Ruixin Wang et al.
3 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

Current status and solutions for AI ethics in ophthalmology: a bibliometric analysis

Lingyi Liang, Yahan Yang, Yu‐Chun Lin, Ruixin Wang, Matthew J. Burton, Weixing Zhang, Mingjie Luo, Patrick Yu‐Wai‐Man, Xinwei Chen, Haotian Lin, Dongyuan Yun
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Ophthalmology, an early adopter of medical artificial intelligence (AI), has made significant advancements, but ethical discussions limited. This bibliometric analysis reviewed 498 publications from Web of Science and Scopus (2000-2023) to explore the evolution, status, thematic trends, data modalities and their ethical focus, and solutions in ophthalmic AI ethics. Ophthalmology ranks second in medical AI ethics, with major contributors from the United States (US), China, the United Kingdom (UK), Singapore and India. Ethical concerns focus on privacy, fairness, and transparency. Ethical priorities differ by modality with fundus imaging (59.4%) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) (30.9%) as the most common. Most studies (78.3%) address ethics in diagnostic algorithm development, while only 11.5% directly target ethical concerns, though this focus is increasing. This study highlights the need for AI technologies and guidelines to address ethical challenges in ophthalmology, offering a future direction for research and innovation in medical AI governance.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), University of Cambridge (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Hainan Eye Hospital (CN), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB), MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit (GB)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.