Multi-frequency altimetry snow depth estimates over heterogeneous snow-covered Antarctic summer sea ice – Part 2: Comparing airborne estimates with near-coincident CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 (CRYO2ICE)

Abstract. For the first time, a comparison of altimetry-derived snow depth estimates between dual-frequency spaceborne and near-coincident multi-frequency airborne estimates is conducted using data from the recent under-flight of a CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 (CRYO2ICE) orbit by a simultaneous airborne campaign over the Weddell Sea in December 2022 carrying Ka-, Ku-, C/S-band radars and a scanning near-infrared lidar. From this unique combination of airborne sensors, the accuracy of snow depth captured by the near-coincident CRYO2ICE orbits can be evaluated. The CRYO2ICE snow depth achieved along the orbit was, on average, 0.34 m, which is within 0.01 m from passive-microwave-derived observations and 0.12 m from a model-based estimate. The retrieval methodology appears to play a significant role, which we suspect is highly dependent on the classification and filtration schemes applied to remove potentially ambiguous altimetry observations. Comparison with airborne snow depths at 25 km segments showed correlations of 0.51–0.53, a bias of 0.03 m, and root-mean-square deviation of 0.08 m when using the airborne lidar scanner as air–snow interface and C/S-band at maximum amplitude at the snow–ice interface. To understand how comparisons across ground, air, and space shall be conducted, especially in preparation for the upcoming dual-frequency radar altimeter mission Copernicus Polar Ice and Snow Topography Altimeter (CRISTAL), it is critical that we investigate the impact of different scattering mechanisms at varying frequencies for diverging viewing geometries considering dissimilar spatial and range resolutions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcryosphere
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4193-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-frequency altimetry snow depth estimates over heterogeneous snow-covered Antarctic summer sea ice – Part 2: Comparing airborne estimates with near-coincident CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 (CRYO2ICE)

Eero Rinne, Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen, Donghui Yi, Jeremy Wilkinson et al.
2 citations
˜The œcryosphere
Cryospheric studies and observations
2.60
article

Multi-frequency altimetry snow depth estimates over heterogeneous snow-covered Antarctic summer sea ice – Part 2: Comparing airborne estimates with near-coincident CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 (CRYO2ICE)

Eero Rinne, Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen, Donghui Yi, Jeremy Wilkinson, Knut V. Høyland, Sebastian B. Simonsen, Jilu Li, Arttu Jutila, Tânia Casal, Fernando Rodríguez‐Morales, R. Forsberg, Henriette Skourup, Isobel R. Lawrence, Gaëlle Veyssière, Andrew Shepherd
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. For the first time, a comparison of altimetry-derived snow depth estimates between dual-frequency spaceborne and near-coincident multi-frequency airborne estimates is conducted using data from the recent under-flight of a CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 (CRYO2ICE) orbit by a simultaneous airborne campaign over the Weddell Sea in December 2022 carrying Ka-, Ku-, C/S-band radars and a scanning near-infrared lidar. From this unique combination of airborne sensors, the accuracy of snow depth captured by the near-coincident CRYO2ICE orbits can be evaluated. The CRYO2ICE snow depth achieved along the orbit was, on average, 0.34 m, which is within 0.01 m from passive-microwave-derived observations and 0.12 m from a model-based estimate. The retrieval methodology appears to play a significant role, which we suspect is highly dependent on the classification and filtration schemes applied to remove potentially ambiguous altimetry observations. Comparison with airborne snow depths at 25 km segments showed correlations of 0.51–0.53, a bias of 0.03 m, and root-mean-square deviation of 0.08 m when using the airborne lidar scanner as air–snow interface and C/S-band at maximum amplitude at the snow–ice interface. To understand how comparisons across ground, air, and space shall be conducted, especially in preparation for the upcoming dual-frequency radar altimeter mission Copernicus Polar Ice and Snow Topography Altimeter (CRISTAL), it is critical that we investigate the impact of different scattering mechanisms at varying frequencies for diverging viewing geometries considering dissimilar spatial and range resolutions.

˜The œcryosphereVol. 19(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cryospheric studies and observations
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.