Democratic Legitimacy and Decisions for the Future

Abstract This paper engages two claims defended by Axel Gosseries in What is intergenerational justice. The first is that the demands of democratic legitimacy cannot be met in the political relations between present and future people because future people cannot authorize decisions made today. In response, I cast doubt on the necessity of authorization for democratic legitimacy. Representative claims can, in some cases, be legitimate by democratic standards even if they are not authorized. The second claim advanced by Gosseries is that democratic legitimacy applies to the relations between present and future people since future people are governed by the decisions made today. Contrary to Gosseries, I argue that the imposition of burdens is neither sufficient nor necessary for decisions to govern others. Instead, the paper argues that de facto authority is the more relevant condition and that intergenerational relations of de facto authority are unlikely ever to obtain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Res Publica
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-025-09717-y
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratic Legitimacy and Decisions for the Future

Ludvig Beckman
Res Publica
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Democratic Legitimacy and Decisions for the Future

Ludvig Beckman
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper engages two claims defended by Axel Gosseries in What is intergenerational justice. The first is that the demands of democratic legitimacy cannot be met in the political relations between present and future people because future people cannot authorize decisions made today. In response, I cast doubt on the necessity of authorization for democratic legitimacy. Representative claims can, in some cases, be legitimate by democratic standards even if they are not authorized. The second claim advanced by Gosseries is that democratic legitimacy applies to the relations between present and future people since future people are governed by the decisions made today. Contrary to Gosseries, I argue that the imposition of burdens is neither sufficient nor necessary for decisions to govern others. Instead, the paper argues that de facto authority is the more relevant condition and that intergenerational relations of de facto authority are unlikely ever to obtain.

Res Publica
Stockholm University (SE), Institute for Futures Studies (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Democratic Legitimacy and Decisions for the Future — Ludvig Beckman · Res Publica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS