Comparing preserved and preservative-free artificial tear drops on tear film stability and flow rate in dry eye

Aim: To compare the effect of preservative-containing artificial tears and preservative-free artificial tears on tear film stability among adults with dry eye syndrome. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 80 participants (40 females and 40 males), aged 19 to 69 years, who were randomly selected after completing the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, with only those with OSDI scores of 13 and above included in the study. Participants were divided into two groups. One group received artificial tears containing 0.3% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose preserved with 0.01% benzalkonium chloride (Hypromellose eye drops, manufactured by Martindale Pharmaceuticals), and the other group received preservative-free artificial tears containing 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium and 0.9% glycerin (Refresh eye drops, manufactured by AbbVie). Each participant was instructed to instill one drop in each eye, four times daily, for four weeks. Tear film stability, measured using Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT), and Tear Flow Rate assessed with Schirmer’s test, were recorded for each participant before and after the application of the respective artificial tear eye drops. Paired T-test and one-way ANOVA were employed to analyze data using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SSPS version 22.0) Results: Both groups showed statistically significant increases in tear film stability and tear flow rate post-treatment, as evidenced by paired T-tests (p < 0.05). However, the comparison using ANOVA indicated no significant differences in the tear film stability and tear flow rate after four weeks (p > 0.05). Conclusion: There was no notable difference between preservative-containing artificial tears eye drops and preservative-free artificial tears eye drops on tear film stability and tear flow rate, therefore clinicians can confidently recommend both non-preservative-free and preservative-free artificial tears as effective management options for dry eye.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Nigerian Optometric Association
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4314/jnoa.v27i2.6
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing preserved and preservative-free artificial tear drops on tear film stability and flow rate in dry eye

Eghosasere Iyamu, Clinton Ifeanyi Okechukwu, Benjamin Fortune Obuchi
Journal of the Nigerian Optometric Association
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Comparing preserved and preservative-free artificial tear drops on tear film stability and flow rate in dry eye

Eghosasere Iyamu, Clinton Ifeanyi Okechukwu, Benjamin Fortune Obuchi
article en

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effect of preservative-containing artificial tears and preservative-free artificial tears on tear film stability among adults with dry eye syndrome. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 80 participants (40 females and 40 males), aged 19 to 69 years, who were randomly selected after completing the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, with only those with OSDI scores of 13 and above included in the study. Participants were divided into two groups. One group received artificial tears containing 0.3% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose preserved with 0.01% benzalkonium chloride (Hypromellose eye drops, manufactured by Martindale Pharmaceuticals), and the other group received preservative-free artificial tears containing 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium and 0.9% glycerin (Refresh eye drops, manufactured by AbbVie). Each participant was instructed to instill one drop in each eye, four times daily, for four weeks. Tear film stability, measured using Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT), and Tear Flow Rate assessed with Schirmer’s test, were recorded for each participant before and after the application of the respective artificial tear eye drops. Paired T-test and one-way ANOVA were employed to analyze data using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SSPS version 22.0) Results: Both groups showed statistically significant increases in tear film stability and tear flow rate post-treatment, as evidenced by paired T-tests (p < 0.05). However, the comparison using ANOVA indicated no significant differences in the tear film stability and tear flow rate after four weeks (p > 0.05). Conclusion: There was no notable difference between preservative-containing artificial tears eye drops and preservative-free artificial tears eye drops on tear film stability and tear flow rate, therefore clinicians can confidently recommend both non-preservative-free and preservative-free artificial tears as effective management options for dry eye.

Journal of the Nigerian Optometric AssociationVol. 27(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing preserved and preservative-free artificial tear drops on tear film stability and flow rate in dry eye — Eghosasere Iyamu, Clinton Ifeanyi Okechukwu, et al. · Journal of the Nigerian Optometric Association (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS