Sobornost and the Orthodox Tradition in the Thought of Dmitry Alekseevich Khomyakov

This article examines Dmitry Khomyakov’s interpretation of the triad "Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationality", with a particular focus on his understanding of sobornost’ and the Orthodox tradition. The study reconstructs Khomyakov’s views by addressing three key questions: the meaning he assigns to the concept of Orthodoxy; his assessment of its influence on the state, mentality, and history of Russia; and the practical implications he draws from his conceptual framework within the historical context of his time. The analysis employs comparative- historical and historical- typological methods, as well as the genealogy of ideas — particularly in relation to sobornost’. The principal sources are Khomyakov’s own writings, published in their most complete form in a 2011 collected edition. The findings show that Khomyakov upheld the Orthodox tradition and the doctrine of sobornost’, using the latter to formulate an original historiosophical framework that integrated politics, society, family, nationality, art, and science. A distinctive feature of this framework is its emphasis on individuality, expressed as a pronounced personalism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Church History
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15829/2686-973x-2025-185
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sobornost and the Orthodox Tradition in the Thought of Dmitry Alekseevich Khomyakov

I. V. Shebitchenko
Russian Journal of Church History
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Sobornost and the Orthodox Tradition in the Thought of Dmitry Alekseevich Khomyakov

I. V. Shebitchenko
article en

Abstract

This article examines Dmitry Khomyakov’s interpretation of the triad "Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationality", with a particular focus on his understanding of sobornost’ and the Orthodox tradition. The study reconstructs Khomyakov’s views by addressing three key questions: the meaning he assigns to the concept of Orthodoxy; his assessment of its influence on the state, mentality, and history of Russia; and the practical implications he draws from his conceptual framework within the historical context of his time. The analysis employs comparative- historical and historical- typological methods, as well as the genealogy of ideas — particularly in relation to sobornost’. The principal sources are Khomyakov’s own writings, published in their most complete form in a 2011 collected edition. The findings show that Khomyakov upheld the Orthodox tradition and the doctrine of sobornost’, using the latter to formulate an original historiosophical framework that integrated politics, society, family, nationality, art, and science. A distinctive feature of this framework is its emphasis on individuality, expressed as a pronounced personalism.

Russian Journal of Church HistoryVol. 6(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.