‘Grammar of Dissent’: Conceptualising Religious Faith in the Works of John Henry Newman and Semyon Frank

This article examines the engagement of the Russian philosopher Semyon Frank with the thought of the English theologian John Henry Newman. While both thinkers pursued a philosophical account of religious faith, their approaches diverged significantly. Newman centred his theology on the notion of assent — the acceptance of dogmatic truths through religious imagination and non-abstract, personal knowledge. Frank, by contrast, emphasised mystical religious experience as supra- rational and supersensual, yet carrying its own distinctive certainty. This contrast reflects the broader divergence between Western and Eastern Christian theological traditions, which may be traced, in part, to Aristotelian and Platonic intellectual lineages respectively. Although Frank did not associate Newman with the modernist currents he criticised, his early writings engaged critically with the "new religious consciousness" of Dmitry Merezhkovsky. Despite their differing epistemological frameworks, both Newman and Frank advanced a form of Christian philosophical apologetics that sought to reconcile faith with intellectual integrity in the modern world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Church History
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15829/2686-973x-2025-203
Primary Topic
Catholicism and Religious Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Grammar of Dissent’: Conceptualising Religious Faith in the Works of John Henry Newman and Semyon Frank

Konstantin M. Matsan
Russian Journal of Church History
Catholicism and Religious Studies
article

‘Grammar of Dissent’: Conceptualising Religious Faith in the Works of John Henry Newman and Semyon Frank

Konstantin M. Matsan
article en

Abstract

This article examines the engagement of the Russian philosopher Semyon Frank with the thought of the English theologian John Henry Newman. While both thinkers pursued a philosophical account of religious faith, their approaches diverged significantly. Newman centred his theology on the notion of assent — the acceptance of dogmatic truths through religious imagination and non-abstract, personal knowledge. Frank, by contrast, emphasised mystical religious experience as supra- rational and supersensual, yet carrying its own distinctive certainty. This contrast reflects the broader divergence between Western and Eastern Christian theological traditions, which may be traced, in part, to Aristotelian and Platonic intellectual lineages respectively. Although Frank did not associate Newman with the modernist currents he criticised, his early writings engaged critically with the "new religious consciousness" of Dmitry Merezhkovsky. Despite their differing epistemological frameworks, both Newman and Frank advanced a form of Christian philosophical apologetics that sought to reconcile faith with intellectual integrity in the modern world.

Russian Journal of Church HistoryVol. 6(3)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Catholicism and Religious Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.