Why Incels Capture Attention: A Cultural Attraction Theory Perspective

Incels (involuntary celibates) are a misogynistic online subculture whose members define themselves by a perceived inability to form sexual or romantic relationships. Despite rare but high-profile instances of ideological violence, most empirical research shows that they struggle primarily with poor mental health rather than engage in organized extremism. Yet the group commands disproportionate public attention, illustrated most recently by Netflix’s Adolescence, which quickly became the platform’s most-watched mini-series of all time and sparked intense political discussion despite being fictional. Beyond this, the incel motif recurs in artistic depictions across film and musical lyrics and has entered common parlance as a popular insult directed at men. Why are incels so captivating? Drawing on cultural attraction theory and evolutionary psychology, we argue that incel narratives resonate with evolved cognitive biases that make them particularly “sticky.” These include biases towards sex-related content, moral violations, negativity, coalitional threat, protectiveness of women, and morbid curiosity toward dangerous young men. Incels also qualify as minimally counterintuitive, violating gendered expectations by centering their identity on male sexual exclusion. These features render incel discourse especially memorable and transmissible. We conclude by considering the implications of this cultural virality for media, policy-makers, and public discourse, highlighting the risks of letting cultural attraction rather than empirical accuracy shape responses to incels.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b7cmv_v1
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Incels Capture Attention: A Cultural Attraction Theory Perspective

Alberto Acerbi, William Costello
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Why Incels Capture Attention: A Cultural Attraction Theory Perspective

Alberto Acerbi, William Costello
article en

Abstract

Incels (involuntary celibates) are a misogynistic online subculture whose members define themselves by a perceived inability to form sexual or romantic relationships. Despite rare but high-profile instances of ideological violence, most empirical research shows that they struggle primarily with poor mental health rather than engage in organized extremism. Yet the group commands disproportionate public attention, illustrated most recently by Netflix’s Adolescence, which quickly became the platform’s most-watched mini-series of all time and sparked intense political discussion despite being fictional. Beyond this, the incel motif recurs in artistic depictions across film and musical lyrics and has entered common parlance as a popular insult directed at men. Why are incels so captivating? Drawing on cultural attraction theory and evolutionary psychology, we argue that incel narratives resonate with evolved cognitive biases that make them particularly “sticky.” These include biases towards sex-related content, moral violations, negativity, coalitional threat, protectiveness of women, and morbid curiosity toward dangerous young men. Incels also qualify as minimally counterintuitive, violating gendered expectations by centering their identity on male sexual exclusion. These features render incel discourse especially memorable and transmissible. We conclude by considering the implications of this cultural virality for media, policy-makers, and public discourse, highlighting the risks of letting cultural attraction rather than empirical accuracy shape responses to incels.

Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.