Comparing Large Language Models and Traditional Machine Translation Tools for Translating Medical Consultation Summaries – A Pilot Feasibility Study (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Translation of medical consultation summaries is essential for equitable healthcare communication in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations. While machine translation (MT) tools and large language models (LLMs) are widely accessible, their feasibility and safety for healthcare contexts remain underexplored. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This pilot study investigates the feasibility of using LLMs and traditional MT tools to translate medical consultation summaries from English into the most common languages other than English spoken in Australia – Arabic, Chinese (simplified written form), and Vietnamese - the three most common languages other than English in Australia. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> Two simulated summaries -a simple, patient-facing summary and a complex, clinician-orientated interprofessional letter - were translated using three LLMs (GPT-4o, LLAMA-3.1, GEMMA-2) and three MT tools (Google Translate, Microsoft Bing Translator, DeepL). Translations were benchmarked against professional third party interpreter translations using BLEU, CHR-F, and METEOR metrics. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Translation performance varied across languages, tools, and summary complexity. Traditional MT tools outperformed LLMs on surface-level metrics, while LLMs showed relative strengths in semantic similarity for Vietnamese and Chinese. Arabic translations improved with complex input, suggesting morphological advantages. Metric-based evaluation highlighted feasibility but also risks, particularly in Chinese clinical contexts. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> This pilot provides formative evidence of opportunities and limitations in applying AI translation for healthcare communication. Findings underscore the importance of human oversight, domain-specific evaluation metrics, and further formative and clinical research to guide safe, equitable use of AI translation tools. </sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.85169
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Large Language Models and Traditional Machine Translation Tools for Translating Medical Consultation Summaries – A Pilot Feasibility Study (Preprint)

Andy Li, Peter Poon, Rashina Hoda, Wei Zhou et al.
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
article

Comparing Large Language Models and Traditional Machine Translation Tools for Translating Medical Consultation Summaries – A Pilot Feasibility Study (Preprint)

Andy Li, Peter Poon, Rashina Hoda, Wei Zhou, Chris Bain
article en

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Translation of medical consultation summaries is essential for equitable healthcare communication in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations. While machine translation (MT) tools and large language models (LLMs) are widely accessible, their feasibility and safety for healthcare contexts remain underexplored. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This pilot study investigates the feasibility of using LLMs and traditional MT tools to translate medical consultation summaries from English into the most common languages other than English spoken in Australia – Arabic, Chinese (simplified written form), and Vietnamese - the three most common languages other than English in Australia. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> Two simulated summaries -a simple, patient-facing summary and a complex, clinician-orientated interprofessional letter - were translated using three LLMs (GPT-4o, LLAMA-3.1, GEMMA-2) and three MT tools (Google Translate, Microsoft Bing Translator, DeepL). Translations were benchmarked against professional third party interpreter translations using BLEU, CHR-F, and METEOR metrics. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Translation performance varied across languages, tools, and summary complexity. Traditional MT tools outperformed LLMs on surface-level metrics, while LLMs showed relative strengths in semantic similarity for Vietnamese and Chinese. Arabic translations improved with complex input, suggesting morphological advantages. Metric-based evaluation highlighted feasibility but also risks, particularly in Chinese clinical contexts. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> This pilot provides formative evidence of opportunities and limitations in applying AI translation for healthcare communication. Findings underscore the importance of human oversight, domain-specific evaluation metrics, and further formative and clinical research to guide safe, equitable use of AI translation tools. </sec>

Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.