Comparison of Hematocrit Values Using the Microhematocrit Method and the Automatic Hematology Analyzer

Background & Objective: Hematocrit is the percentage of erythrocyte volume in blood that is important for assessing health status, especially in relation to oxygen transport capacity. Hematocrit tests can be performed manually (microhematocrit) or automatically (hematology analyzer). Differences in the working principles of the two methods can cause variations in results. This study aims to determine the difference in hematocrit values using the microhematocrit method and the automatic hematology analyzer. Method: This study is analytical in nature with a quantitative approach, using 30 venous blood samples from outpatients at Kraton Pekalongan Regional General Hospital. The examination was performed using the microhematocrit method and the automatic hematology analyzer. The data were analyzed using normality tests and Paired Sample T-Tests using SPSS. Result: The average hematocrit value using the manual microhematocrit method was 33.33%, while the average value using the automatic hematology analyzer was 32.41%. The statistical test results showed a significant value of 0.075 (P> 0.05), indicating that there was no significant difference between the two methods. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the hematocrit values obtained by the microhematocrit method and the automatic hematology analyzer. Both methods can be used interchangeably depending on the availability of equipment and clinical needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INDOGENIUS
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56359/igj.v4i3.655
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Hematocrit Values Using the Microhematocrit Method and the Automatic Hematology Analyzer

Aditea Etnawati Putri, Suparyati
INDOGENIUS
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
article

Comparison of Hematocrit Values Using the Microhematocrit Method and the Automatic Hematology Analyzer

Aditea Etnawati Putri, Suparyati
article en

Abstract

Background & Objective: Hematocrit is the percentage of erythrocyte volume in blood that is important for assessing health status, especially in relation to oxygen transport capacity. Hematocrit tests can be performed manually (microhematocrit) or automatically (hematology analyzer). Differences in the working principles of the two methods can cause variations in results. This study aims to determine the difference in hematocrit values using the microhematocrit method and the automatic hematology analyzer. Method: This study is analytical in nature with a quantitative approach, using 30 venous blood samples from outpatients at Kraton Pekalongan Regional General Hospital. The examination was performed using the microhematocrit method and the automatic hematology analyzer. The data were analyzed using normality tests and Paired Sample T-Tests using SPSS. Result: The average hematocrit value using the manual microhematocrit method was 33.33%, while the average value using the automatic hematology analyzer was 32.41%. The statistical test results showed a significant value of 0.075 (P> 0.05), indicating that there was no significant difference between the two methods. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the hematocrit values obtained by the microhematocrit method and the automatic hematology analyzer. Both methods can be used interchangeably depending on the availability of equipment and clinical needs.

INDOGENIUSVol. 4(3)
Universitas Pekalongan (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Hematocrit Values Using the Microhematocrit Method and the Automatic Hematology Analyzer — Aditea Etnawati Putri, Suparyati · INDOGENIUS (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS