Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Formulas for Toric IOLs Optical Power Calculating at Lens Surgery in Patients after Penetrating Keratoplasty

Purpose . To compare the effectiveness of 9 calculating the IOL optical power formulas for toric monofocal IOL and wavefront formation mechanism IOL at cataract surgical treatment in patients after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Patients and methods . The study included 68 patients (68 eyes) underwent cataract surgery after PK. 32 patients (32 eyes) were implanted with the EDOF IOL AcrySof IQ Vivity DFTx15 (group A), and 36 patients (36 eyes) were implanted with the monofocal IOL AcrySof IQ Toric SN6ATx (group B). The average period after the PK procedure in group A was 49.06 ± 18.48 months, in group B — 53.25 ± 17.19 months. The average age was 45.71 ± 13.65 years, 27 men, 41 women. The optical power of the IOL was calculated using the Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, SRK/T, Haigis, Kane, Barrett Toric Calculator, EVO formulas. The last two formulas were calculated with the predicted (PPC) and measured posterior corneal surface (MPC). Results . The lowest values of the median absolute error (MedAE) were noted for formulas that take into account the measured posterior surface of the cornea — Barrett Toric Calculator (in group A MedAE = 0.778; in group B MedAE = 0.805) and EVO (in group A MedAE = 0.799; in group B MedAE = 0.801). In group A, the highest percentage of hits within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D were obtained for the Barrett (MPC) formulas (±0.5 D — 34.4%; ±1.0 D — 59.4%), Kane (±0.5 D — 31.3%; ±1.0 D — 56.3%) and EVO (MPC) (±0.5 D — 31.3%; ±1.0 D — 56.3%); in group B, within ±0.5 D for the Barrett (MPC) (16.7%) and EVO (MPC) (16.7%) formulas, within ±1.0 D for the Barrett (MPC) (41.7%), Kane (38.9%) and EVO (MPC) (38.9%) formulas. Conclusion . Using the posterior corneal surface parameters in the IOL optical power calculating allows more accurate target refraction in patients with PK. The Barrett Toric Calculator and EVO formulas with the introduction of posterior corneal surface parameters can be recommended for use in clinical practice of aphakia surgical correction in patients with previously performed PK.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmology in Russia
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-589-595
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Formulas for Toric IOLs Optical Power Calculating at Lens Surgery in Patients after Penetrating Keratoplasty

D. A. Khvan, G. A. Fedyashev, M. P. Ruchkin
Ophthalmology in Russia
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Formulas for Toric IOLs Optical Power Calculating at Lens Surgery in Patients after Penetrating Keratoplasty

D. A. Khvan, G. A. Fedyashev, M. P. Ruchkin
article en

Abstract

Purpose . To compare the effectiveness of 9 calculating the IOL optical power formulas for toric monofocal IOL and wavefront formation mechanism IOL at cataract surgical treatment in patients after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Patients and methods . The study included 68 patients (68 eyes) underwent cataract surgery after PK. 32 patients (32 eyes) were implanted with the EDOF IOL AcrySof IQ Vivity DFTx15 (group A), and 36 patients (36 eyes) were implanted with the monofocal IOL AcrySof IQ Toric SN6ATx (group B). The average period after the PK procedure in group A was 49.06 ± 18.48 months, in group B — 53.25 ± 17.19 months. The average age was 45.71 ± 13.65 years, 27 men, 41 women. The optical power of the IOL was calculated using the Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, SRK/T, Haigis, Kane, Barrett Toric Calculator, EVO formulas. The last two formulas were calculated with the predicted (PPC) and measured posterior corneal surface (MPC). Results . The lowest values of the median absolute error (MedAE) were noted for formulas that take into account the measured posterior surface of the cornea — Barrett Toric Calculator (in group A MedAE = 0.778; in group B MedAE = 0.805) and EVO (in group A MedAE = 0.799; in group B MedAE = 0.801). In group A, the highest percentage of hits within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D were obtained for the Barrett (MPC) formulas (±0.5 D — 34.4%; ±1.0 D — 59.4%), Kane (±0.5 D — 31.3%; ±1.0 D — 56.3%) and EVO (MPC) (±0.5 D — 31.3%; ±1.0 D — 56.3%); in group B, within ±0.5 D for the Barrett (MPC) (16.7%) and EVO (MPC) (16.7%) formulas, within ±1.0 D for the Barrett (MPC) (41.7%), Kane (38.9%) and EVO (MPC) (38.9%) formulas. Conclusion . Using the posterior corneal surface parameters in the IOL optical power calculating allows more accurate target refraction in patients with PK. The Barrett Toric Calculator and EVO formulas with the introduction of posterior corneal surface parameters can be recommended for use in clinical practice of aphakia surgical correction in patients with previously performed PK.

Ophthalmology in RussiaVol. 22(3)
Vladivostok State Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.