Impact of Saline Water Irrigation on Soil Carbon Pool Composition and the Response of Carbon Emissions to Water Regulation

ABSTRACT In areas with freshwater resource shortages, although saline water irrigation can alleviate agricultural water‐use pressure, long‐term application may lead to soil salinisation and ecological function degradation, thereby affecting greenhouse gas emissions. To clarify its influence on the soil carbon cycle and greenhouse gas emissions, this study collected farmland soil subjected to long‐term saline water irrigation (S1: 1 g/L, S2: 4 g/L, and S3: 8 g/L) and analysed the dynamic changes in CO 2 emissions and carbon and nitrogen components through controlled indoor experiments. The soil moisture gradient was defined as follows: W1, W2, and W3 correspond to 45%, 60%, and 75% of the field water‐holding capacity, respectively. The results indicated that soil total carbon and total nitrogen decreased over time and were more strongly affected by salinity than by moisture, with both parameters peaking at a salinity level of S2. Both dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass (microbial biomass carbon, microbial biomass nitrogen) responded distinctly to moisture and salinity: dissolved organic carbon decreased initially and then increased as the salinity increased (S3 > S1 > S2), but it consistently decreased with increasing soil moisture (W1 > W2 > W3), while microbial biomass carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen rose as the soil moisture increased (W3 > W2 > W1). Microbial biomass nitrogen demonstrated higher salt tolerance than carbon biomass, peaking at S2, whereas microbial biomass carbon declined with rising salinity (S1 > S2 > S3). Soil moisture and salinity significantly influenced CO 2 emissions. CO 2 levels increased with rising soil moisture (W3 > W2 > W1). Moderate salinity promoted CO 2 emissions, whereas high salinity suppressed them (S2 > S1 > S3). Compared to the W3S2 treatment, which showed the maximum value ( p < 0.05 ), CO 2 emissions were reduced by 13.84% in W3S1, 24.85% in W3S3, 33.63% in W1S2, and 20.54% in W2S2. These results recommend controlling irrigation salinity at ≤ 4 g/L and maintaining water content at 60%–75% of the water holding capacity to synergistically sustain soil health and emission reduction benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70120
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Saline Water Irrigation on Soil Carbon Pool Composition and the Response of Carbon Emissions to Water Regulation

Shoutian Ma, Yang Gao, Yuan‐Yuan Wang, Anqi Zhang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
article

Impact of Saline Water Irrigation on Soil Carbon Pool Composition and the Response of Carbon Emissions to Water Regulation

Shoutian Ma, Yang Gao, Yuan‐Yuan Wang, Anqi Zhang, Junpeng Zhang, Yuanyuan Fu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In areas with freshwater resource shortages, although saline water irrigation can alleviate agricultural water‐use pressure, long‐term application may lead to soil salinisation and ecological function degradation, thereby affecting greenhouse gas emissions. To clarify its influence on the soil carbon cycle and greenhouse gas emissions, this study collected farmland soil subjected to long‐term saline water irrigation (S1: 1 g/L, S2: 4 g/L, and S3: 8 g/L) and analysed the dynamic changes in CO 2 emissions and carbon and nitrogen components through controlled indoor experiments. The soil moisture gradient was defined as follows: W1, W2, and W3 correspond to 45%, 60%, and 75% of the field water‐holding capacity, respectively. The results indicated that soil total carbon and total nitrogen decreased over time and were more strongly affected by salinity than by moisture, with both parameters peaking at a salinity level of S2. Both dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass (microbial biomass carbon, microbial biomass nitrogen) responded distinctly to moisture and salinity: dissolved organic carbon decreased initially and then increased as the salinity increased (S3 > S1 > S2), but it consistently decreased with increasing soil moisture (W1 > W2 > W3), while microbial biomass carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen rose as the soil moisture increased (W3 > W2 > W1). Microbial biomass nitrogen demonstrated higher salt tolerance than carbon biomass, peaking at S2, whereas microbial biomass carbon declined with rising salinity (S1 > S2 > S3). Soil moisture and salinity significantly influenced CO 2 emissions. CO 2 levels increased with rising soil moisture (W3 > W2 > W1). Moderate salinity promoted CO 2 emissions, whereas high salinity suppressed them (S2 > S1 > S3). Compared to the W3S2 treatment, which showed the maximum value ( p < 0.05 ), CO 2 emissions were reduced by 13.84% in W3S1, 24.85% in W3S3, 33.63% in W1S2, and 20.54% in W2S2. These results recommend controlling irrigation salinity at ≤ 4 g/L and maintaining water content at 60%–75% of the water holding capacity to synergistically sustain soil health and emission reduction benefits.

Journal of Agronomy and Crop ScienceVol. 211(6)
Ningxia Water Conservancy (CN), Farmland Irrigation Research Institute (CN), Xinxiang University (CN), Shandong Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.