Optimizing small mustelid monitoring: Enclosed camera traps increase detection of the smallest carnivores

Abstract Land use changes in Europe contribute to the decline of once‐abundant species. While these declines are well documented for some species, other, more elusive species could quietly disappear. As a result, small mustelids are believed to be declining across their historical range. Their small size and elusive ecology make small mustelids challenging to monitor and thus remain understudied. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of three camera trap‐based methods to monitor common weasel Mustela nivalis , stoat Mustela erminea , and European polecat Mustela putorius . We deployed unenclosed, semi‐enclosed, and fully enclosed camera traps in a clustered design incorporating all methods during the fall of 2023 in two extensive agricultural areas in the Netherlands. Using a multi‐scale occupancy approach, we assessed (1) how detection probabilities differ among the three camera trap methods for each small mustelid species and (2) how scent‐based lures and placement near passages influenced detection probabilities. We found that weasels had the highest detection probability in fully enclosed camera traps placed within clusters containing a scent‐based lure. The detection probability of stoats was highest in fully enclosed camera traps, regardless of the presence or absence of lure, as well as in unenclosed camera traps with no lure nearby. Polecats had the highest detection probability in unenclosed camera traps, regardless of lure presence, and in semi‐enclosed camera traps without lure nearby. Placing camera traps near passages increased detection probability for all three species. Practical implication : This study advances monitoring protocols for small mustelids, a group facing suspected population declines despite limited data. We highlight different detection probabilities among three mustelid species using various camera‐trap methods. Camera trap placement and species‐specific use of scent‐based lures, beneficial for weasels but not for stoats or polecats, should be considered by researchers and wildlife managers. Combining fully enclosed and unenclosed camera traps enhances species detection and offers broader ecological insights by monitoring other prey and predator mammals as bycatch. Our findings provide practical guidance for large‐scale monitoring efforts of small mustelids across Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.70120
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing small mustelid monitoring: Enclosed camera traps increase detection of the smallest carnivores

Tim R. Hofmeester, Jasja Dekker, Christian Smit, Bob Jonge Poerink et al.
1 citations
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Optimizing small mustelid monitoring: Enclosed camera traps increase detection of the smallest carnivores

Tim R. Hofmeester, Jasja Dekker, Christian Smit, Bob Jonge Poerink, Pieter J. Otte
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Land use changes in Europe contribute to the decline of once‐abundant species. While these declines are well documented for some species, other, more elusive species could quietly disappear. As a result, small mustelids are believed to be declining across their historical range. Their small size and elusive ecology make small mustelids challenging to monitor and thus remain understudied. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of three camera trap‐based methods to monitor common weasel Mustela nivalis , stoat Mustela erminea , and European polecat Mustela putorius . We deployed unenclosed, semi‐enclosed, and fully enclosed camera traps in a clustered design incorporating all methods during the fall of 2023 in two extensive agricultural areas in the Netherlands. Using a multi‐scale occupancy approach, we assessed (1) how detection probabilities differ among the three camera trap methods for each small mustelid species and (2) how scent‐based lures and placement near passages influenced detection probabilities. We found that weasels had the highest detection probability in fully enclosed camera traps placed within clusters containing a scent‐based lure. The detection probability of stoats was highest in fully enclosed camera traps, regardless of the presence or absence of lure, as well as in unenclosed camera traps with no lure nearby. Polecats had the highest detection probability in unenclosed camera traps, regardless of lure presence, and in semi‐enclosed camera traps without lure nearby. Placing camera traps near passages increased detection probability for all three species. Practical implication : This study advances monitoring protocols for small mustelids, a group facing suspected population declines despite limited data. We highlight different detection probabilities among three mustelid species using various camera‐trap methods. Camera trap placement and species‐specific use of scent‐based lures, beneficial for weasels but not for stoats or polecats, should be considered by researchers and wildlife managers. Combining fully enclosed and unenclosed camera traps enhances species detection and offers broader ecological insights by monitoring other prey and predator mammals as bycatch. Our findings provide practical guidance for large‐scale monitoring efforts of small mustelids across Europe.

Ecological Solutions and EvidenceVol. 6(4)
University of Groningen (NL), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), The eNose (Netherlands) (NL), Royal Dutch Athletics Federation (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing small mustelid monitoring: Enclosed camera traps increase detection of the smallest carnivores — Tim R. Hofmeester, Jasja Dekker, et al. · Ecological Solutions and Evidence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS