A longitudinal analysis of declining medical safety messaging in generative AI models

Generative AI models, including large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs), are increasingly used to interpret medical images and answer clinical questions. However, their responses often include inaccuracies; therefore, safety measures like medical disclaimers are critical. In this study, we evaluated the presence of disclaimers in LLM and VLM outputs across model generations released from 2022 to 2025. Responses were generated from 500 mammograms, 500 chest X-rays, 500 dermatology images, and 500 medical questions drawn from a new dataset we introduced: TIMed-Q (Top Internet Medical Question Dataset). TIMed-Q captures the most frequently searched medical queries by patients, reflecting real-world health information-seeking behavior. Disclaimer presence in LLM outputs dropped from 26.3% in 2022 to 0.97% in 2025, while VLM disclaimer rates declined from 19.6% in 2023 to 1.05%. By 2025, most models displayed no disclaimers. As models gain further capability, disclaimers must function as adaptive safeguards tailored to clinical contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01943-1
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A longitudinal analysis of declining medical safety messaging in generative AI models

Roxana Daneshjou, Ahmed Alaa, S. Sharma
6 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
14.19
article

A longitudinal analysis of declining medical safety messaging in generative AI models

Roxana Daneshjou, Ahmed Alaa, S. Sharma
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Generative AI models, including large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs), are increasingly used to interpret medical images and answer clinical questions. However, their responses often include inaccuracies; therefore, safety measures like medical disclaimers are critical. In this study, we evaluated the presence of disclaimers in LLM and VLM outputs across model generations released from 2022 to 2025. Responses were generated from 500 mammograms, 500 chest X-rays, 500 dermatology images, and 500 medical questions drawn from a new dataset we introduced: TIMed-Q (Top Internet Medical Question Dataset). TIMed-Q captures the most frequently searched medical queries by patients, reflecting real-world health information-seeking behavior. Disclaimer presence in LLM outputs dropped from 26.3% in 2022 to 0.97% in 2025, while VLM disclaimer rates declined from 19.6% in 2023 to 1.05%. By 2025, most models displayed no disclaimers. As models gain further capability, disclaimers must function as adaptive safeguards tailored to clinical contexts.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of California, San Francisco (US), Stanford Medicine (US), University of California, Berkeley (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
14.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.