Do Your Job, Keep Your Seat: The Causal Effect of MPs' Legislation on Reelection

ABSTRACT Distinguishing between personal and party votes is inherently challenging, and it remains unclear to what extent they function in each country. This study employs the ballot of a private member's bill as an instrumental variable to examine whether legislative behavior influences electoral outcomes in the United Kingdom, which has a highly institutionalized party system. The findings reveal that legislative behavior increases the vote share of Conservative MPs by 2.6 percentage points compared to the previous election. However, given the high prominence of the party vote, this increase is only large enough to change the electoral winner in just under 10% of the constituencies. Furthermore, for opposition MPs, legislative behavior had no effect in any respect. Nevertheless, this result suggests that personal votes exist even in an unlikely case—when party competition is intense and MPs have limited autonomy in Parliament.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70037
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Your Job, Keep Your Seat: The Causal Effect of MPs' Legislation on Reelection

Serika Atsumi
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Do Your Job, Keep Your Seat: The Causal Effect of MPs' Legislation on Reelection

Serika Atsumi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Distinguishing between personal and party votes is inherently challenging, and it remains unclear to what extent they function in each country. This study employs the ballot of a private member's bill as an instrumental variable to examine whether legislative behavior influences electoral outcomes in the United Kingdom, which has a highly institutionalized party system. The findings reveal that legislative behavior increases the vote share of Conservative MPs by 2.6 percentage points compared to the previous election. However, given the high prominence of the party vote, this increase is only large enough to change the electoral winner in just under 10% of the constituencies. Furthermore, for opposition MPs, legislative behavior had no effect in any respect. Nevertheless, this result suggests that personal votes exist even in an unlikely case—when party competition is intense and MPs have limited autonomy in Parliament.

Legislative Studies QuarterlyVol. 50(4)
Tokyo University of Science (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Your Job, Keep Your Seat: The Causal Effect of MPs' Legislation on Reelection — Serika Atsumi · Legislative Studies Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS