Understanding COVID-19 vaccination disparity among Black adults in North America: A two-study motivational approach

Previous research has revealed lower vaccination rates among Black communities relative to other racial-ethnic communities in North America. However, there remains a gap in understanding the motivational barriers contributing to these persistent disparities. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, the current research aimed to examine the effects of different motivations for vaccine acceptance across population groups (autonomous, controlled, and amotivation). The current investigation involved two survey studies conducted in the United States and Canada during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 1 was cross-sectional and included 623 Americans (60.4 % female). Study 2 was a prospective longitudinal study of 413 Canadians (54 % female; M<sub>age</sub> = 47.6, SD = 17.9). In both studies, Black adults reported significantly lower levels of vaccination (M<sub>Black</sub> = 1.15 vs. M<sub>Non-Black</sub> = 1.48 in Study 1; M<sub>Black</sub> = 2.25 vs. M<sub>Non-Black</sub> = 2.63 in Study 2), lower autonomous motivation, and higher distrust-based amotivation compared to individuals from other population groups. In the cross-sectional study, autonomous motivation (β = 0.45, p < .001) was positively associated with vaccine uptake while distrust-based amotivation (β = -0.23, p < .001) was negatively associated with vaccine uptake. In the longitudinal study, distrust-based amotivation (β = -0.11, p < .01) was associated with vaccination uptake for all groups, while lower autonomous motivation (b = 0.17, p < .01) and higher controlled motivation (b = -0.14, p < .05) were associated with lower vaccine uptake among Black individuals. These findings suggest that while addressing distrust-based amotivation at the institutional and systemic level to promote utilization of vaccination services is essential across all population groups, tailored public health interventions and policies that foster a sense of autonomy over one's healthcare decisions may play a particularly significant role for Black adults in supporting vaccine acceptance and uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127803
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding COVID-19 vaccination disparity among Black adults in North America: A two-study motivational approach

Anne C. Holding, Richard Koestner, Élodie C. Audet, Helen Thai et al.
Vaccine
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Understanding COVID-19 vaccination disparity among Black adults in North America: A two-study motivational approach

Anne C. Holding, Richard Koestner, Élodie C. Audet, Helen Thai, Xiaoyan Fang
article en

Abstract

Previous research has revealed lower vaccination rates among Black communities relative to other racial-ethnic communities in North America. However, there remains a gap in understanding the motivational barriers contributing to these persistent disparities. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, the current research aimed to examine the effects of different motivations for vaccine acceptance across population groups (autonomous, controlled, and amotivation). The current investigation involved two survey studies conducted in the United States and Canada during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 1 was cross-sectional and included 623 Americans (60.4 % female). Study 2 was a prospective longitudinal study of 413 Canadians (54 % female; M<sub>age</sub> = 47.6, SD = 17.9). In both studies, Black adults reported significantly lower levels of vaccination (M<sub>Black</sub> = 1.15 vs. M<sub>Non-Black</sub> = 1.48 in Study 1; M<sub>Black</sub> = 2.25 vs. M<sub>Non-Black</sub> = 2.63 in Study 2), lower autonomous motivation, and higher distrust-based amotivation compared to individuals from other population groups. In the cross-sectional study, autonomous motivation (β = 0.45, p < .001) was positively associated with vaccine uptake while distrust-based amotivation (β = -0.23, p < .001) was negatively associated with vaccine uptake. In the longitudinal study, distrust-based amotivation (β = -0.11, p < .01) was associated with vaccination uptake for all groups, while lower autonomous motivation (b = 0.17, p < .01) and higher controlled motivation (b = -0.14, p < .05) were associated with lower vaccine uptake among Black individuals. These findings suggest that while addressing distrust-based amotivation at the institutional and systemic level to promote utilization of vaccination services is essential across all population groups, tailored public health interventions and policies that foster a sense of autonomy over one's healthcare decisions may play a particularly significant role for Black adults in supporting vaccine acceptance and uptake.

VaccineVol. 65
McGill University (CA), Concordia University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.