Gaps in Global Alien Plant Trait Data and How to Fill Them

ABSTRACT Aim Functional traits help to understand the ecological processes underlying biological invasions. The extent to which trait data are available for alien plants at the global scale is unknown. In this study, we assess the availability of trait data and identify global gaps and biases. Location Global. Time Period Present. Major Taxa Studied Vascular plants. Methods We used the GloNAF database to get a global list of plants naturalised outside their native range and their distributions. We combined data from the four largest trait databases: AusTraits, BIEN, GIFT, and TRY, on which we performed taxonomic and trait harmonisation. We studied the availability of trait data. Then, based on the distribution data, we tested to what extent trait knowledge was driven by ecological and socioeconomic variables. Results We found that the species‐by‐trait matrix (2764 traits for 14,539 species) was only 1.5% complete, with most traits measured for very few species. Only ten traits were available for more than 50% of all alien plants. Four percent of the species lacked all trait data, while 27% of species had data for the three key plant traits: leaf mass per area, seed mass, and plant height. We observed a strong latitudinal gradient in trait knowledge, with tropical regions showing lower trait knowledge than higher latitudes, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere. Growth form, range size, and invasion status were the strongest predictors of trait knowledge, with widespread, invasive tree species being better recorded than other alien species. Main Conclusions We identified large trait data gaps at a global scale for alien plants, which limits our ability to study functional invasion ecology at large spatial scales. These gaps are partly driven by uneven sampling and a lack of trait data integration across sources. We recommend prioritising the most invasion‐relevant traits and coordinating community efforts of plant and invasion scientists to sample them in a standardised way, which could help close these gaps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70131
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaps in Global Alien Plant Trait Data and How to Fill Them

Marten Winter, Franz Essl, Petr Pyšek, Ingolf Kühn et al.
3 citations
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
6.94
article

Gaps in Global Alien Plant Trait Data and How to Fill Them

Marten Winter, Franz Essl, Petr Pyšek, Ingolf Kühn, Mark van Kleunen, Patrick Weigelt, Wayne Dawson, Matthias Grenié, Holger Kreft, Helge Bruelheide
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Functional traits help to understand the ecological processes underlying biological invasions. The extent to which trait data are available for alien plants at the global scale is unknown. In this study, we assess the availability of trait data and identify global gaps and biases. Location Global. Time Period Present. Major Taxa Studied Vascular plants. Methods We used the GloNAF database to get a global list of plants naturalised outside their native range and their distributions. We combined data from the four largest trait databases: AusTraits, BIEN, GIFT, and TRY, on which we performed taxonomic and trait harmonisation. We studied the availability of trait data. Then, based on the distribution data, we tested to what extent trait knowledge was driven by ecological and socioeconomic variables. Results We found that the species‐by‐trait matrix (2764 traits for 14,539 species) was only 1.5% complete, with most traits measured for very few species. Only ten traits were available for more than 50% of all alien plants. Four percent of the species lacked all trait data, while 27% of species had data for the three key plant traits: leaf mass per area, seed mass, and plant height. We observed a strong latitudinal gradient in trait knowledge, with tropical regions showing lower trait knowledge than higher latitudes, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere. Growth form, range size, and invasion status were the strongest predictors of trait knowledge, with widespread, invasive tree species being better recorded than other alien species. Main Conclusions We identified large trait data gaps at a global scale for alien plants, which limits our ability to study functional invasion ecology at large spatial scales. These gaps are partly driven by uneven sampling and a lack of trait data integration across sources. We recommend prioritising the most invasion‐relevant traits and coordinating community efforts of plant and invasion scientists to sample them in a standardised way, which could help close these gaps.

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 34(10)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Vienna (AT), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Konstanz (DE), Charles University (CZ), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (CZ), Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (FR), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR), University of Göttingen (DE), Taizhou University (CN), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Leipzig University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grantová Agentura České Republiky, Austrian Science Fund, Akademie Věd České Republiky, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
6.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.