Physical fitness among elite female football and handball players

This study examined the differences in physical fitness between elite female football and handball players competing at the highest level. A total of 38 athletes participated, divided into two groups: football players (N = 20) and handball players (N = 18). Anthropometric characteristics, body composition, and motor abilities, including speed, agility, and explosive strength, were assessed using standardized tests. The results revealed significant differences in body composition, with handball players being taller (173.6 ± 4.7 cm vs. 165.7 ± 4.7 cm, p = .00) and heavier (69.7 ± 10.9 kg vs. 60.9 ± 8.0 kg, p = .00), while football players had a higher percentage of muscle mass (42.9 ± 3.4% vs. 32.2 ± 2.7%, p = .00) and lower body fat (22.4 ± 6.1% vs. 27.6 ± 6.0%, p = .01). Regarding physical performance, football players outperformed handball players in agility, particularly in the zig-zag test (5.74 ± 0.32 s vs. 6.08 ± 0.38 s, p = .00). Conversely, handball players demonstrated superior explosive strength, as evidenced by better results in the countermovement jump with arm swing (CMJa: 32.5 ± 5.0 cm vs. 28.8 ± 3.4 cm, p = .01). No significant differences were found in sprint performance over 10m (1.84 ± 0.16 s vs. 1.89 ± 0.12 s, p = .25), 20m (3.35 ± 0.22 s vs. 3.33 ± 0.18 s, p = .78), and 30m (4.66 ± 0.20 s vs. 4.75 ± 0.24 s, p = .20). These findings highlighted the influence of sport-specific demands on athletes’ physical profiles and motor abilities. Understanding these differences could assist coaches in designing targeted training programs to optimize performance and address specific fitness needs. Future research should incorporate a larger sample size and explore additional physiological and biomechanical variables to further elucidate the distinctions between these two sports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55860/zpa7rv13
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical fitness among elite female football and handball players

Karuppasamy Govindasamy, Igor Jelaska, Mima Stanković, Viorel Petru Ardelean et al.
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

Physical fitness among elite female football and handball players

Karuppasamy Govindasamy, Igor Jelaska, Mima Stanković, Viorel Petru Ardelean, Stefan Đorđević, Maša Antonijević, Borko Katanić, Doroteja Rančić, Goran Jelaska
article en

Abstract

This study examined the differences in physical fitness between elite female football and handball players competing at the highest level. A total of 38 athletes participated, divided into two groups: football players (N = 20) and handball players (N = 18). Anthropometric characteristics, body composition, and motor abilities, including speed, agility, and explosive strength, were assessed using standardized tests. The results revealed significant differences in body composition, with handball players being taller (173.6 ± 4.7 cm vs. 165.7 ± 4.7 cm, p = .00) and heavier (69.7 ± 10.9 kg vs. 60.9 ± 8.0 kg, p = .00), while football players had a higher percentage of muscle mass (42.9 ± 3.4% vs. 32.2 ± 2.7%, p = .00) and lower body fat (22.4 ± 6.1% vs. 27.6 ± 6.0%, p = .01). Regarding physical performance, football players outperformed handball players in agility, particularly in the zig-zag test (5.74 ± 0.32 s vs. 6.08 ± 0.38 s, p = .00). Conversely, handball players demonstrated superior explosive strength, as evidenced by better results in the countermovement jump with arm swing (CMJa: 32.5 ± 5.0 cm vs. 28.8 ± 3.4 cm, p = .01). No significant differences were found in sprint performance over 10m (1.84 ± 0.16 s vs. 1.89 ± 0.12 s, p = .25), 20m (3.35 ± 0.22 s vs. 3.33 ± 0.18 s, p = .78), and 30m (4.66 ± 0.20 s vs. 4.75 ± 0.24 s, p = .20). These findings highlighted the influence of sport-specific demands on athletes’ physical profiles and motor abilities. Understanding these differences could assist coaches in designing targeted training programs to optimize performance and address specific fitness needs. Future research should incorporate a larger sample size and explore additional physiological and biomechanical variables to further elucidate the distinctions between these two sports.

Journal of Human Sport and ExerciseVol. 21(1)
University of Nis (RS), Symbiosis International University (IN), United States Sports Academy (US), College for Management in Tourism and Informatics in Virovitica (HR), Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad (RO), University of Split (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.