Multi-method material selection for adsorption using Bayesian approaches

Machine learning is reshaping the discovery of new materials, yet a persistent challenge is selecting the most informative training data from large and complex databases. Here we present a framework that integrates inducing points with diverse data acquisition strategies from active learning and Bayesian optimization to guide the selection of material training sets. We compare purely explorative selection, based on Gaussian process regression uncertainty, with exploitation-based approaches such as expected improvement and probability of improvement. Using methane uptake in metal–organic frameworks as a case study, we evaluate structures by properties such as void fraction, pore diameters, and accessible surface area. An intersection analysis across methods identifies a consensus set of 611 frameworks and key pressure points consistently chosen as informative. Training on this reduced subset yields a highly accurate predictive model, demonstrating that principled data selection accelerates adsorption modeling and enables more efficient materials screening. A major challenge in machine learning is selecting the most appropriate training data from large databases. Here, a framework that integrates inducing points with active learning and Bayesian optimization for selecting training sets is reported, and used to identify metal-organic frameworks for methane uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Materials
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-025-00933-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-method material selection for adsorption using Bayesian approaches

Yamil J. Colón, Etinosa Osaro, Ashiat Bakare
3 citations
Communications Materials
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.55
article

Multi-method material selection for adsorption using Bayesian approaches

Yamil J. Colón, Etinosa Osaro, Ashiat Bakare
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Machine learning is reshaping the discovery of new materials, yet a persistent challenge is selecting the most informative training data from large and complex databases. Here we present a framework that integrates inducing points with diverse data acquisition strategies from active learning and Bayesian optimization to guide the selection of material training sets. We compare purely explorative selection, based on Gaussian process regression uncertainty, with exploitation-based approaches such as expected improvement and probability of improvement. Using methane uptake in metal–organic frameworks as a case study, we evaluate structures by properties such as void fraction, pore diameters, and accessible surface area. An intersection analysis across methods identifies a consensus set of 611 frameworks and key pressure points consistently chosen as informative. Training on this reduced subset yields a highly accurate predictive model, demonstrating that principled data selection accelerates adsorption modeling and enables more efficient materials screening. A major challenge in machine learning is selecting the most appropriate training data from large databases. Here, a framework that integrates inducing points with active learning and Bayesian optimization for selecting training sets is reported, and used to identify metal-organic frameworks for methane uptake.

Communications MaterialsVol. 6(1)
University of Notre Dame (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Notre Dame, Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.