Early Mortality and Mid-Term Durability of Open Surgical Repair for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Octogenarians: A Retrospective Analysis from Two Tertiary Referral Centers
<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Complex endovascular solutions have expanded treatment options for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA), particularly in elderly high-risk patients. However, these techniques are limited by anatomical constraints and costs, while the superiority over open repair (OSR) remains debatable. This study aimed to compare short- and mid-term outcomes of OSR for cAAA in patients aged ≥80 versus <80 years. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective analysis was performed for patients who underwent OSR for cAAA between 2017 and 2022 at two tertiary vascular centers. A total of 226 patients (median age 71 years [IQR 66-80]; 89% male) were included, of whom 74 were aged ≥80 years. Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and early reintervention. Secondary endpoints included length of stay (LOS), acute kidney injury, new renal dysfunction, mid-term survival (≤5 years), and procedure-related reintervention. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for baseline differences. <b>Results</b>: Out of 1087 screened patients, 226 met the inclusion criteria: 74 octogenarians and 152 younger patients. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in octogenarians (9.5% vs. 0.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), as was the incidence of MACE (8.2% vs. 1.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.026). Rates of kidney impairment LOS and other major complications were comparable. During a median follow-up of 42.7 months, mid-term survival and freedom from reintervention did not differ significantly between groups. PSM analysis confirmed higher early mortality and cardiovascular events in octogenarians but similar mid-term outcomes. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although octogenarians undergoing OSR for cAAA face increased early mortality and cardiovascular complications, their mid-term survival and freedom from reintervention are comparable to younger patients. These results suggest that age alone should not represent a contraindication to open repair in appropriately selected individuals.
Authors
- Jacopo Galafassi
- Ludovica Ettorre
- P Ricciardi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1232-7003)
- Ludovic Canaud (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6751-1188)
- Luca Giovannacci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4987-0262)
- P Girardet
- Daniel Schmauß
- Giorgio Prouse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7947-3473)
- Alessandro Robaldo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9247-8818)
- Alexandre Azoulay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7812-8688)
- F Andréoli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8645-9036)
- Pierre Alric (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1919-2351)
Institutions
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Université de Montpellier (FR)
- Physiologie et Médecine Expérimentale du Coeur et des Muscles (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR)
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (CH)
- Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier (FR)
- Hôpital Louis Pradel (FR)
- Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2025-10-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196983
- Primary Topic
- Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00