Comparison of Liver Venous Deprivation Versus Portal Vein Embolization in Patients with Liver Malignancies: A Systematic Review

Background: Liver cancer, either primary or metastatic, is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths and in many cases is presented in stages requiring major hepatectomy. Adequate future liver remnant (FLR) volume is essential before any major hepatectomy. Portal vein embolization (PVE) has long been the standard technique for preoperative liver hypertrophy, but liver venous deprivation (LVD) has emerged as a novel method, potentially offering faster and superior results. The aim of this study is to compare FLR hypertrophy outcomes between LVD and PVE in patients undergoing major hepatectomy for liver malignancy. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane library, and clinicaltrials.gov for studies assessing FLR volume changes after LVD or PVE in patients with primary or secondary liver tumors undergoing liver resection. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO and was prepared according to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Twelve retrospective cohort studies were included in this systematic review. Liver venous deprivation consistently demonstrated superior FLR hypertrophy, with a faster and higher percentage increase compared to PVE. Time to resection was also shorter in the LVD groups in most studies. Safety outcomes were comparable, with no consistent difference in post-procedural complications or mortality. Conclusions: Liver venous deprivation may potentially be a safe and effective alternative to PVE, offering more robust and rapid FLR hypertrophy with similar morbidity and mortality rates. While current evidence supports its superiority in selected patients, future validation with larger prospective clinical trials is essential before it can be adopted as standard management of patients with insufficient FLR volume.