Evaluation and comparison of tools used to quantify aggregate PFAS exposure: Extractable organic fluorine, PFAS burden scores and summed PFAS concentrations

This study highlights the potential of extractable organofluorine (EOF) as a comprehensive biomarker for assessing aggregate PFAS exposure in human populations. By analyzing data from eight studies across the US, Asia, and Europe, we found that EOF concentrations were higher than summed PFAS concentrations and correlated strongly with PFAS burden scores. Although EOF does not identify specific fluorine sources, its strong associations suggest it is a practical tool for detecting high PFAS exposure. While EOF offers promise for identifying at-risk populations, practical challenges in laboratory analyses may limit its widespread use in biomonitoring programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00806-x
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and comparison of tools used to quantify aggregate PFAS exposure: Extractable organic fluorine, PFAS burden scores and summed PFAS concentrations

Shelley H. Liu, Katherine E. Manz, Ronald Klein, Joseph M. Braun
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
article

Evaluation and comparison of tools used to quantify aggregate PFAS exposure: Extractable organic fluorine, PFAS burden scores and summed PFAS concentrations

Shelley H. Liu, Katherine E. Manz, Ronald Klein, Joseph M. Braun
article en

Abstract

This study highlights the potential of extractable organofluorine (EOF) as a comprehensive biomarker for assessing aggregate PFAS exposure in human populations. By analyzing data from eight studies across the US, Asia, and Europe, we found that EOF concentrations were higher than summed PFAS concentrations and correlated strongly with PFAS burden scores. Although EOF does not identify specific fluorine sources, its strong associations suggest it is a practical tool for detecting high PFAS exposure. While EOF offers promise for identifying at-risk populations, practical challenges in laboratory analyses may limit its widespread use in biomonitoring programs.

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental EpidemiologyVol. 35(6)
Brown University (US), University of Michigan (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation and comparison of tools used to quantify aggregate PFAS exposure: Extractable organic fluorine, PFAS burden scores and summed PFAS concentrations — Shelley H. Liu, Katherine E. Manz, et al. · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS