Inappropriate Empirical Antibiotic Therapy and Mortality in Critical Illness: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score Analysis in an Indonesian ICU

Introduction: Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (IEAT) is a critical driver of mortality in sepsis, particularly in regions with high antimicrobial resistance (AMR) like Southeast Asia. This study aimed to quantify the association between IEAT and 28-day mortality in a critically ill Indonesian patient cohort, employing advanced statistical methods to control for confounding. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 280 adult patients who received empirical antibiotics and had positive cultures upon admission to a tertiary ICU in Indonesia (January 2022–December 2023). The primary exposure was the appropriateness of the initial antibiotic regimen (IEAT vs. AEAT) based on in-vitro susceptibility. We used multivariate logistic regression and a 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis to adjust for baseline differences in patient severity, including APACHE II score and the presence of septic shock. Results: In the full cohort, 108 patients (38.6%) received IEAT. The 28-day mortality was profoundly higher in the IEAT group than the AEAT group (77.8% vs. 8.1%; p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, IEAT remained a powerful predictor of mortality (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR]: 38.72; 95% CI: 18.91–79.30; p < 0.001). In the PSM cohort of 200 patients with balanced baseline characteristics, the association remained strong and significant (OR: 25.15, 95% CI: 11.54–54.81; p < 0.001). Local prescribing patterns revealed that levofloxacin monotherapy, the most common regimen, had an inappropriateness rate of 76.4%. Conclusion: Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy is strongly associated with a substantially increased risk of death in critically ill Indonesian patients. This association persists after rigorous adjustment for confounding. These findings highlight the urgent need for robust antimicrobial stewardship programs, guided by dynamic local surveillance, to combat the lethal impact of AMR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Research
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37275/jacr.v6i2.807
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inappropriate Empirical Antibiotic Therapy and Mortality in Critical Illness: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score Analysis in an Indonesian ICU

Wiwi Jaya, Riska Yulinta Viandini, Arie Zainul Fatoni
Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Research
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Inappropriate Empirical Antibiotic Therapy and Mortality in Critical Illness: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score Analysis in an Indonesian ICU

Wiwi Jaya, Riska Yulinta Viandini, Arie Zainul Fatoni
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (IEAT) is a critical driver of mortality in sepsis, particularly in regions with high antimicrobial resistance (AMR) like Southeast Asia. This study aimed to quantify the association between IEAT and 28-day mortality in a critically ill Indonesian patient cohort, employing advanced statistical methods to control for confounding. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 280 adult patients who received empirical antibiotics and had positive cultures upon admission to a tertiary ICU in Indonesia (January 2022–December 2023). The primary exposure was the appropriateness of the initial antibiotic regimen (IEAT vs. AEAT) based on in-vitro susceptibility. We used multivariate logistic regression and a 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis to adjust for baseline differences in patient severity, including APACHE II score and the presence of septic shock. Results: In the full cohort, 108 patients (38.6%) received IEAT. The 28-day mortality was profoundly higher in the IEAT group than the AEAT group (77.8% vs. 8.1%; p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, IEAT remained a powerful predictor of mortality (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR]: 38.72; 95% CI: 18.91–79.30; p < 0.001). In the PSM cohort of 200 patients with balanced baseline characteristics, the association remained strong and significant (OR: 25.15, 95% CI: 11.54–54.81; p < 0.001). Local prescribing patterns revealed that levofloxacin monotherapy, the most common regimen, had an inappropriateness rate of 76.4%. Conclusion: Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy is strongly associated with a substantially increased risk of death in critically ill Indonesian patients. This association persists after rigorous adjustment for confounding. These findings highlight the urgent need for robust antimicrobial stewardship programs, guided by dynamic local surveillance, to combat the lethal impact of AMR.

Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical ResearchVol. 6(2)
University of Brawijaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.