Anthropogenic Microparticles in Aquaculture and Wild Fish: A Case Study of Three Commercially Important Species in the Eastern Mediterranean

Over the past decade, increasing attention has been given to the impacts of anthropogenic microparticle (AM) pollution on marine ecosystems. This study investigates AM ingestion in three commercially important fish species—Sparus aurata Linnaeus, 1758, Dicentrarchus labrax Linnaeus, 1758, and Boops boops Linnaeus, 1758—collected from both wild and farmed populations in Greek marine and lagoon environments. A total of 60 specimens were sampled from the Messolonghi Lagoon, Rhodes Island, and the Cyclades. AM were detected in 61.7% of the individuals analyzed. The mean number of ingested items per individual was 1.1 ± 1.2 in B. boops, 1.0 ± 1.7 in wild and 2.3 ± 2.1 in farmed S. aurata, and 2.5 ± 3.1 in wild and 3.6 ± 2.2 in farmed D. labrax. Ingestion ranged from 0 to 9 items per fish. No significant correlations were found between fish size and either the number or the size of ingested AM in any species. The ingested AM were primarily classified as fibers and fragments, displaying variability in size and color. Black was the dominant color across all species, followed by red and blue, while yellow was rarely observed. A statistically significant difference in the mean size of AM was recorded between wild and farmed D. labrax, whereas no such difference was observed for S. aurata. Overall, these findings provide new evidence on AM contamination in seafood species and highlight their occurrence in both natural and aquaculture environments of the eastern Mediterranean.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fishes
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10100492
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropogenic Microparticles in Aquaculture and Wild Fish: A Case Study of Three Commercially Important Species in the Eastern Mediterranean

Niki Milatou, Persefoni Megalofonou, Aikaterini Kostoula, Eugenia Moschou-Kounopioti
Fishes
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Anthropogenic Microparticles in Aquaculture and Wild Fish: A Case Study of Three Commercially Important Species in the Eastern Mediterranean

Niki Milatou, Persefoni Megalofonou, Aikaterini Kostoula, Eugenia Moschou-Kounopioti
article en

Abstract

Over the past decade, increasing attention has been given to the impacts of anthropogenic microparticle (AM) pollution on marine ecosystems. This study investigates AM ingestion in three commercially important fish species—Sparus aurata Linnaeus, 1758, Dicentrarchus labrax Linnaeus, 1758, and Boops boops Linnaeus, 1758—collected from both wild and farmed populations in Greek marine and lagoon environments. A total of 60 specimens were sampled from the Messolonghi Lagoon, Rhodes Island, and the Cyclades. AM were detected in 61.7% of the individuals analyzed. The mean number of ingested items per individual was 1.1 ± 1.2 in B. boops, 1.0 ± 1.7 in wild and 2.3 ± 2.1 in farmed S. aurata, and 2.5 ± 3.1 in wild and 3.6 ± 2.2 in farmed D. labrax. Ingestion ranged from 0 to 9 items per fish. No significant correlations were found between fish size and either the number or the size of ingested AM in any species. The ingested AM were primarily classified as fibers and fragments, displaying variability in size and color. Black was the dominant color across all species, followed by red and blue, while yellow was rarely observed. A statistically significant difference in the mean size of AM was recorded between wild and farmed D. labrax, whereas no such difference was observed for S. aurata. Overall, these findings provide new evidence on AM contamination in seafood species and highlight their occurrence in both natural and aquaculture environments of the eastern Mediterranean.

FishesVol. 10(10)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.