A Comparative Analysis of Defense Mechanisms Against Model Inversion Attacks on Tabular Data

As more machine learning models are used in sensitive fields like healthcare, finance, and smart infrastructure, protecting structured tabular data from privacy attacks is a key research challenge. Although several privacy-preserving methods have been proposed for tabular data, a comprehensive comparison of their performance and trade-offs has yet to be conducted. We introduce and empirically assess a combined defense system that integrates differential privacy, federated learning, adaptive noise injection, hybrid cryptographic encryption, and ensemble-based obfuscation. The given strategies are analyzed on the benchmark tabular datasets (ADULT, GSS, FTE), showing that the suggested methods can mitigate up to 50 percent of model inversion attacks in relation to baseline models without decreasing the model utility (F1 scores are higher than 0.85). Moreover, on these datasets, our results match or exceed the latest state-of-the-art (SOTA) in terms of privacy. We also transform each defense into essential data privacy laws worldwide (GDPR and HIPAA), suggesting the best applicable guidelines for the ethical and regulation-sensitive deployment of privacy-preserving machine learning models in sensitive spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcp5040080
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Defense Mechanisms Against Model Inversion Attacks on Tabular Data

Ka Ching Chan, Raj Gururajan, Neethu Vijayan
Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

A Comparative Analysis of Defense Mechanisms Against Model Inversion Attacks on Tabular Data

Ka Ching Chan, Raj Gururajan, Neethu Vijayan
article en

Abstract

As more machine learning models are used in sensitive fields like healthcare, finance, and smart infrastructure, protecting structured tabular data from privacy attacks is a key research challenge. Although several privacy-preserving methods have been proposed for tabular data, a comprehensive comparison of their performance and trade-offs has yet to be conducted. We introduce and empirically assess a combined defense system that integrates differential privacy, federated learning, adaptive noise injection, hybrid cryptographic encryption, and ensemble-based obfuscation. The given strategies are analyzed on the benchmark tabular datasets (ADULT, GSS, FTE), showing that the suggested methods can mitigate up to 50 percent of model inversion attacks in relation to baseline models without decreasing the model utility (F1 scores are higher than 0.85). Moreover, on these datasets, our results match or exceed the latest state-of-the-art (SOTA) in terms of privacy. We also transform each defense into essential data privacy laws worldwide (GDPR and HIPAA), suggesting the best applicable guidelines for the ethical and regulation-sensitive deployment of privacy-preserving machine learning models in sensitive spaces.

Journal of Cybersecurity and PrivacyVol. 5(4)
University of Southern Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Defense Mechanisms Against Model Inversion Attacks on Tabular Data — Ka Ching Chan, Raj Gururajan, et al. · Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS