Prehospital analgesia for trauma-related pain by paramedics: a comparative retrospective observational study of paracetamol, nalbuphine plus paracetamol, and piritramide

In this retrospective observational study, we compared the efficacy and safety of paracetamol compared with those of nalbuphine plus paracetamol and piritramide in prehospital analgesia for trauma-related pain administered by paramedics. All prehospital analgesia for trauma-related pain administered by paramedics in the emergency medical services of the districts of Fulda (piritramide) and Guetersloh (paracetamol, nalbuphine plus paracetamol) was analyzed based on electronic medical records. Primary endpoint was effective analgesia defined as a numeric rating scale (NRS) score ≤ 4 at hospital admission. Safety was evaluated based on the occurrence of drug-related complications (nausea/vomiting, antiemetic use, reduced level of consciousness, respiratory or hemodynamic insufficiency). A total of 1,295 interventions (district of Guetersloh: n = 784 [60.5%], district of Fulda: n = 511 [39.5%]) were analyzed. Paracetamol: n = 291 [22.5%], initial NRS: 6.8 ± 1.4, final NRS: 4.0 ± 1.9. Nalbuphine plus paracetamol: n = 493 [38.1%], initial NRS: 8.2 ± 1.3, final NRS: 3.6 ± 1.9. Piritramide: n = 511 [39.5%], initial NRS: 8.3 ± 1.1, final NRS: 4.3 ± 1.5. The likelihood of achieving NRS ≤ 4 at hospital admission was highest in the nalbuphine plus paracetamol group (odds ratio (OR): 3.25, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.46–4.30) and lower in the piritramide (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.23–0.41) and paracetamol (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.23–0.45) groups. The comparison between piritramide (n = 30 [5.9%]) and nalbuphine plus paracetamol (n = 34 [7.7%]) did not reveal evidence for differences in the occurrence of drug-related complications (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.45–1.24). Analgesia with nalbuphine plus paracetamol for trauma patients administered by paramedics were more effective in reducing pain to NRS ≤ 4 at hospital admission compared to monotherapy with paracetamol or piritramide, with a comparable safety profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01470-8
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prehospital analgesia for trauma-related pain by paramedics: a comparative retrospective observational study of paracetamol, nalbuphine plus paracetamol, and piritramide

Bernd Strickmann, Gerrit Jansen, Thomas Plappert, Jochen Hinkelbein et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Prehospital analgesia for trauma-related pain by paramedics: a comparative retrospective observational study of paracetamol, nalbuphine plus paracetamol, and piritramide

Bernd Strickmann, Gerrit Jansen, Thomas Plappert, Jochen Hinkelbein, Timothy Vollmer, Annika Hoyer, Matthias Kalmbach, Lydia Johnson Kolaparambil Varghese, Julia Johanna Grannemann, Martin Deicke, Marvin Deslandes, Mathini Vaseekaran, Jonas Lohmann
article en

Abstract

In this retrospective observational study, we compared the efficacy and safety of paracetamol compared with those of nalbuphine plus paracetamol and piritramide in prehospital analgesia for trauma-related pain administered by paramedics. All prehospital analgesia for trauma-related pain administered by paramedics in the emergency medical services of the districts of Fulda (piritramide) and Guetersloh (paracetamol, nalbuphine plus paracetamol) was analyzed based on electronic medical records. Primary endpoint was effective analgesia defined as a numeric rating scale (NRS) score ≤ 4 at hospital admission. Safety was evaluated based on the occurrence of drug-related complications (nausea/vomiting, antiemetic use, reduced level of consciousness, respiratory or hemodynamic insufficiency). A total of 1,295 interventions (district of Guetersloh: n = 784 [60.5%], district of Fulda: n = 511 [39.5%]) were analyzed. Paracetamol: n = 291 [22.5%], initial NRS: 6.8 ± 1.4, final NRS: 4.0 ± 1.9. Nalbuphine plus paracetamol: n = 493 [38.1%], initial NRS: 8.2 ± 1.3, final NRS: 3.6 ± 1.9. Piritramide: n = 511 [39.5%], initial NRS: 8.3 ± 1.1, final NRS: 4.3 ± 1.5. The likelihood of achieving NRS ≤ 4 at hospital admission was highest in the nalbuphine plus paracetamol group (odds ratio (OR): 3.25, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.46–4.30) and lower in the piritramide (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.23–0.41) and paracetamol (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.23–0.45) groups. The comparison between piritramide (n = 30 [5.9%]) and nalbuphine plus paracetamol (n = 34 [7.7%]) did not reveal evidence for differences in the occurrence of drug-related complications (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.45–1.24). Analgesia with nalbuphine plus paracetamol for trauma patients administered by paramedics were more effective in reducing pain to NRS ≤ 4 at hospital admission compared to monotherapy with paracetamol or piritramide, with a comparable safety profile.

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency MedicineVol. 33(1)
Osnabrück University (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), Heritage Malta (MT), Theologische Fakultät Fulda (DE), Klinikum Fulda (DE), Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.