Comparison of Outcomes between Minimal Invasive Spine Stabilization and Open Conventional Approach in Thoracolumbar Traumatic Spine Fractures

Background: Thoracolumbar traumatic spine fractures represent one of the most frequent spinal injuries, often necessitating surgical stabilization. While open conventional fixation has been the established method, minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISS) has gained attention due to its potential advantages in reducing surgical morbidity. This study aimed to compare outcomes between MISS and the open conventional approach in patients with thoracolumbar traumatic fractures. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, from January to May 2025. Seventy-six patients meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled and equally assigned to MISS or open conventional fixation groups (38 each). Outcomes assessed included operative time, postoperative pain (Numerical Rating Scale, day seven), hospital stay, and mobilization time. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests, Chi-square tests, and stratified subgroup analyses, with significance set at p<0.05. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups (p>0.05). The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the MISS group (82.4 ± 14.8 min) compared to the open group (93.7 ± 16.5 min, p=0.002). Postoperative pain scores were also lower in MISS (3.2 ± 0.9) versus open surgery (4.7 ± 1.1, p<0.001). Hospital stay was reduced in MISS patients (13.8 ± 2.7 days) compared to open surgery (15.9 ± 3.1 days, p=0.002). Mobilization occurred earlier in the MISS group (3.4 ± 1.2 days) than in the open group (4.8 ± 1.5 days, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent benefits of MISS across most age, gender, and ASA strata. Conclusion: MISS demonstrated superiority over open stabilization in reducing operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and mobilization delay in thoracolumbar traumatic spine fractures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-07-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2352
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Outcomes between Minimal Invasive Spine Stabilization and Open Conventional Approach in Thoracolumbar Traumatic Spine Fractures

Mohsin Ali Raza, Rafia Batool, Muhammad Sohaib Anwar
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Comparison of Outcomes between Minimal Invasive Spine Stabilization and Open Conventional Approach in Thoracolumbar Traumatic Spine Fractures

Mohsin Ali Raza, Rafia Batool, Muhammad Sohaib Anwar
article en

Abstract

Background: Thoracolumbar traumatic spine fractures represent one of the most frequent spinal injuries, often necessitating surgical stabilization. While open conventional fixation has been the established method, minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISS) has gained attention due to its potential advantages in reducing surgical morbidity. This study aimed to compare outcomes between MISS and the open conventional approach in patients with thoracolumbar traumatic fractures. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, from January to May 2025. Seventy-six patients meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled and equally assigned to MISS or open conventional fixation groups (38 each). Outcomes assessed included operative time, postoperative pain (Numerical Rating Scale, day seven), hospital stay, and mobilization time. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests, Chi-square tests, and stratified subgroup analyses, with significance set at p<0.05. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups (p>0.05). The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the MISS group (82.4 ± 14.8 min) compared to the open group (93.7 ± 16.5 min, p=0.002). Postoperative pain scores were also lower in MISS (3.2 ± 0.9) versus open surgery (4.7 ± 1.1, p<0.001). Hospital stay was reduced in MISS patients (13.8 ± 2.7 days) compared to open surgery (15.9 ± 3.1 days, p=0.002). Mobilization occurred earlier in the MISS group (3.4 ± 1.2 days) than in the open group (4.8 ± 1.5 days, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent benefits of MISS across most age, gender, and ASA strata. Conclusion: MISS demonstrated superiority over open stabilization in reducing operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and mobilization delay in thoracolumbar traumatic spine fractures.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(7)
University of Sargodha (PK), Shaikh Zayed Medical College and Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.