Does perceived provider network strength foster telehealth usage among insured populations?

In the wake of the Affordable Care Act's coverage expansions and the COVID-19 pandemic's urgent demand for remote services, telehealth has become a critical gateway to healthcare for underserved and access-challenged populations across the United States. While telehealth offers the potential to reduce barriers related to distance, transportation, and provider shortages, persistent disparities in broadband access, digital literacy, and socioeconomic status continue to shape utilization patterns. Method Utilizing data from the 2024 Financial Inclusion Survey, this study applies a dual modeling strategy. Single-stage Probit, OLS, and Ologit models are used to analyze telehealth utilization and satisfaction. To address nonrandom selection into telehealth, a Heckman two-stage model–incorporating a cubic polynomial for perceived network adequacy and comprehensive controls including an urban/suburban geographic indicator–is implemented. Results Telehealth utilization in this nationally representative cross-sectional sample is unevenly distributed, with higher rates observed in urban and suburban communities. The analysis shows that perceived network adequacy has a nonlinear association with telehealth use: moderate adequacy increases utilization, while very high adequacy may reduce it. Administrative convenience and affordability are associated with higher satisfaction in single-stage models; however, these effects are attenuated after correcting for selection bias (Inverse Mills Ratio, β = −0.778, p < 0.05). Discussion Unobserved factors influencing telehealth adoption also bias satisfaction estimates, highlighting the necessity of correcting for selection effects. The cubic modeling approach effectively captures nonlinear associations between access and satisfaction. Conclusion Accurate assessment of telehealth's impact requires robust adjustment for selection bias. These findings have significant policy implications for improving network adequacy, digital access, and operational efficiency to ensure equitable telehealth adoption and satisfaction, particularly for underserved and non-urban communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Behavioral Economics
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1617041
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does perceived provider network strength foster telehealth usage among insured populations?

Florent Nkouaga
Frontiers in Behavioral Economics
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Does perceived provider network strength foster telehealth usage among insured populations?

Florent Nkouaga
article en

Abstract

In the wake of the Affordable Care Act's coverage expansions and the COVID-19 pandemic's urgent demand for remote services, telehealth has become a critical gateway to healthcare for underserved and access-challenged populations across the United States. While telehealth offers the potential to reduce barriers related to distance, transportation, and provider shortages, persistent disparities in broadband access, digital literacy, and socioeconomic status continue to shape utilization patterns. Method Utilizing data from the 2024 Financial Inclusion Survey, this study applies a dual modeling strategy. Single-stage Probit, OLS, and Ologit models are used to analyze telehealth utilization and satisfaction. To address nonrandom selection into telehealth, a Heckman two-stage model–incorporating a cubic polynomial for perceived network adequacy and comprehensive controls including an urban/suburban geographic indicator–is implemented. Results Telehealth utilization in this nationally representative cross-sectional sample is unevenly distributed, with higher rates observed in urban and suburban communities. The analysis shows that perceived network adequacy has a nonlinear association with telehealth use: moderate adequacy increases utilization, while very high adequacy may reduce it. Administrative convenience and affordability are associated with higher satisfaction in single-stage models; however, these effects are attenuated after correcting for selection bias (Inverse Mills Ratio, β = −0.778, p < 0.05). Discussion Unobserved factors influencing telehealth adoption also bias satisfaction estimates, highlighting the necessity of correcting for selection effects. The cubic modeling approach effectively captures nonlinear associations between access and satisfaction. Conclusion Accurate assessment of telehealth's impact requires robust adjustment for selection bias. These findings have significant policy implications for improving network adequacy, digital access, and operational efficiency to ensure equitable telehealth adoption and satisfaction, particularly for underserved and non-urban communities.

Frontiers in Behavioral EconomicsVol. 4
National AIDS Commission (MW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.