A-144 Is the Q Flag (Blast/Abn Lympho) a sensitive tool for detecting a hematological neoplasm?

Abstract Background Automated hematology analyzers produce accurate WBC differential counts for normal and abnormal values.They flag also the pathological cells to notify the user that the differential may be inaccurate. The counters display Q-flags for Blast/Abnormal Lymphocytes, left shift, and atypical lymphocytes if an abnormal WBC cell population is found. The aim is to compare the sensitivity and specificity of Q-flag for Blast/Abnormal Lymphocytes to the gold standard (flow cytometry) and establish a laboratory detection threshold of Q-flag (Blast/Abn Lympho) for hematological neoplasm (HN). Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was done at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi. Patient’s EDTA blood samples run on the Sysmex XN series (XN-10 module) hematology analyzer were screened for 20 consecutive days. 312 samples with a Q-flag for Blast/Abnormal lymphocyte threshold of >100 were included. Out of these only 67 patients had flow cytometry findings, which were further analyzed. Statistical analyses were done using STATA version 14.0. Rank-sum test, ROC analysis and Youden index criteria were used for calculating sensitivity, specificity and optimal threshold. Results Of 67 samples with flow cytometry data, 49 patients showed blasts in the Q flag and flow cytometry. In hematological neoplasm, the mean Q-flag for blast/abnormal lymphocyte was greater than in non-hematological neoplasm (274.04±44.06 vs. 182.70±77.62) by using t-test and the p-value was significant. Based upon Youden index the threshold =230 was taken.The ROC analysis showed sensitivity of 84% (70.3%-92.7%), specificity of 67%(41%-86.7%) and AUC= 0.76 (0.628-0.875) for Blast/Abn lymphocyte flag at >230 cutoff. Conclusion Q-Blast/Abn Lympho flag threshold >230 may be used as an initial tool for detecting hematological neoplasm. Q-flag by reducing TAT may facilitate early patient diagnosis and initiation of therapy. Limitation: The findings obtained in our study need to be confirmed in a large sample size.Other Q-flags, such as left shift and atypical lymphocyte, were not assessed together in our study. Q Flag for blast/abnormal lymphocyte is a proprietary parameter that may not be available in all instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.140
Primary Topic
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A-144 Is the Q Flag (Blast/Abn Lympho) a sensitive tool for detecting a hematological neoplasm?

Tushar Sehgal, Hemapriya Jayaranga Babu
Clinical Chemistry
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
article

A-144 Is the Q Flag (Blast/Abn Lympho) a sensitive tool for detecting a hematological neoplasm?

Tushar Sehgal, Hemapriya Jayaranga Babu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Automated hematology analyzers produce accurate WBC differential counts for normal and abnormal values.They flag also the pathological cells to notify the user that the differential may be inaccurate. The counters display Q-flags for Blast/Abnormal Lymphocytes, left shift, and atypical lymphocytes if an abnormal WBC cell population is found. The aim is to compare the sensitivity and specificity of Q-flag for Blast/Abnormal Lymphocytes to the gold standard (flow cytometry) and establish a laboratory detection threshold of Q-flag (Blast/Abn Lympho) for hematological neoplasm (HN). Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was done at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi. Patient’s EDTA blood samples run on the Sysmex XN series (XN-10 module) hematology analyzer were screened for 20 consecutive days. 312 samples with a Q-flag for Blast/Abnormal lymphocyte threshold of >100 were included. Out of these only 67 patients had flow cytometry findings, which were further analyzed. Statistical analyses were done using STATA version 14.0. Rank-sum test, ROC analysis and Youden index criteria were used for calculating sensitivity, specificity and optimal threshold. Results Of 67 samples with flow cytometry data, 49 patients showed blasts in the Q flag and flow cytometry. In hematological neoplasm, the mean Q-flag for blast/abnormal lymphocyte was greater than in non-hematological neoplasm (274.04±44.06 vs. 182.70±77.62) by using t-test and the p-value was significant. Based upon Youden index the threshold =230 was taken.The ROC analysis showed sensitivity of 84% (70.3%-92.7%), specificity of 67%(41%-86.7%) and AUC= 0.76 (0.628-0.875) for Blast/Abn lymphocyte flag at >230 cutoff. Conclusion Q-Blast/Abn Lympho flag threshold >230 may be used as an initial tool for detecting hematological neoplasm. Q-flag by reducing TAT may facilitate early patient diagnosis and initiation of therapy. Limitation: The findings obtained in our study need to be confirmed in a large sample size.Other Q-flags, such as left shift and atypical lymphocyte, were not assessed together in our study. Q Flag for blast/abnormal lymphocyte is a proprietary parameter that may not be available in all instruments.

Clinical ChemistryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.