Efficiency Comparison Between Two Different Lasers and Cataract Surgery Workflows: A Prospective and Retrospective Analysis

Using a robotic laser for cataract surgery can save about 5 minutes of surgeon time per case and 8 minutes of patient's time in the OR when compared to a traditional femtosecond laser platform set up.

Authors

Jack Chapman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4578-3024)

Institutions

Georgia Urology (US)

Publication Details

Journal: Clinical ophthalmology
Published: 2025-10-01
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s548211
Primary Topic: Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.00

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Efficiency Comparison Between Two Different Lasers and Cataract Surgery Workflows: A Prospective and Retrospective Analysis

Jack Chapman

Oct 1, 2025

Clinical ophthalmology

Intraocular Surgery and Lenses

article

Efficiency Comparison Between Two Different Lasers and Cataract Surgery Workflows: A Prospective and Retrospective Analysis

Jack Chapman

October 1, 2025article en

Abstract

Clinical ophthalmologyVol. Volume 19

Georgia Urology (US)

Openalex Percentile: Top 60%

Intraocular Surgery and Lenses

DOI Open Access PDF OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Efficiency Comparison Between Two Different Lasers and Cataract Surgery Workflows: A Prospective and Retrospective Analysis — Jack Chapman · Clinical ophthalmology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS