B-027 Preanalytical Processing Evaluation of AB Medical Quick-Clotting Serum Separator Tube, VQ-TUBE: A Comparison with Greiner VACUETTE® CAT Serum Sep Clot Activator Tube

Abstract Background Preanalytical variables significantly impact laboratory test results. Recently, AB Medical developed the quick-clotting serum separator tube, VQ-TUBE, which achieves complete clotting within 10 minutes. We aimed to evaluate the preanalytical utility of VQ-TUBE in comparison to the Greiner VACUETTE® CAT Serum Sep Clot Activator Tube (VACUETTE), which has a clotting time of 30 minutes. The evaluation focused on vacuum retention, clotting time, gel invertibility, and fibrin formation. Methods A total of 20 participants provided blood samples, with each individual having blood drawn into both VQ-TUBE and VACUETTE tubes. For each manufacturer, 10 tubes were stored at room temperature, while the remaining 10 were incubated at 35°C for 48 hours. The evaluation included blood volume retention within the acceptable range (8 mL ± 10%), clotting time assessment at 10 minutes, centrifugation at 3700 rpm for 7 minutes to assess gel invertibility, and visual inspection for fibrin formation in the separated serum. Results Both VQ-TUBE and VACUETTE consistently maintained vacuum levels within the acceptable range. In the 10-minute clotting time evaluation, VQ-TUBE failed to achieve complete clotting in 1 of 20 samples, whereas VACUETTE exhibited complete clotting in all samples. Gel invertibility was satisfactory in all tested tubes. Fibrin formation was observed in 3 of 20 VQ-TUBE samples, whereas VACUETTE samples exhibited fibrin in 7 of 20 samples. Conclusion This study suggests that VQ-TUBE performs comparably to VACUETTE in terms of clotting efficiency, gel separation, and fibrin formation. The shorter clotting time and lower fibrin incidence of VQ-TUBE highlight its potential for improving laboratory workflow efficiency. Further large-scale studies may be necessary to validate these findings across diverse clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.425
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B-027 Preanalytical Processing Evaluation of AB Medical Quick-Clotting Serum Separator Tube, VQ-TUBE: A Comparison with Greiner VACUETTE® CAT Serum Sep Clot Activator Tube

Yeo‐Min Yun, Hanah Kim, Mina Hur, Jeong Seok Seo
Clinical Chemistry
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

B-027 Preanalytical Processing Evaluation of AB Medical Quick-Clotting Serum Separator Tube, VQ-TUBE: A Comparison with Greiner VACUETTE® CAT Serum Sep Clot Activator Tube

Yeo‐Min Yun, Hanah Kim, Mina Hur, Jeong Seok Seo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Preanalytical variables significantly impact laboratory test results. Recently, AB Medical developed the quick-clotting serum separator tube, VQ-TUBE, which achieves complete clotting within 10 minutes. We aimed to evaluate the preanalytical utility of VQ-TUBE in comparison to the Greiner VACUETTE® CAT Serum Sep Clot Activator Tube (VACUETTE), which has a clotting time of 30 minutes. The evaluation focused on vacuum retention, clotting time, gel invertibility, and fibrin formation. Methods A total of 20 participants provided blood samples, with each individual having blood drawn into both VQ-TUBE and VACUETTE tubes. For each manufacturer, 10 tubes were stored at room temperature, while the remaining 10 were incubated at 35°C for 48 hours. The evaluation included blood volume retention within the acceptable range (8 mL ± 10%), clotting time assessment at 10 minutes, centrifugation at 3700 rpm for 7 minutes to assess gel invertibility, and visual inspection for fibrin formation in the separated serum. Results Both VQ-TUBE and VACUETTE consistently maintained vacuum levels within the acceptable range. In the 10-minute clotting time evaluation, VQ-TUBE failed to achieve complete clotting in 1 of 20 samples, whereas VACUETTE exhibited complete clotting in all samples. Gel invertibility was satisfactory in all tested tubes. Fibrin formation was observed in 3 of 20 VQ-TUBE samples, whereas VACUETTE samples exhibited fibrin in 7 of 20 samples. Conclusion This study suggests that VQ-TUBE performs comparably to VACUETTE in terms of clotting efficiency, gel separation, and fibrin formation. The shorter clotting time and lower fibrin incidence of VQ-TUBE highlight its potential for improving laboratory workflow efficiency. Further large-scale studies may be necessary to validate these findings across diverse clinical settings.

Clinical ChemistryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Konkuk University (KR), Konkuk University Medical Center (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.