A-202 A multisite analysis of solid waste generation from 1 million basic metabolic panels

Abstract Background Clinical laboratory operations generate large amounts of waste despite several initiatives for implementation of sustainable practices in laboratory medicine. The basic metabolic panel (BMP) is one of the most routinely performed tests in clinical chemistry. This study evaluated identifiable waste generated to perform BMPs across major chemistry analyzer platforms for a period of one year and estimated the waste that would be produced for running 1 million BMPs. Methods Measurements for readily identifiable consumable waste for BMPs were performed across five academic medical centers encompassing four different wet chemistry platforms (Abbott Alinity, Beckman AU5800, Roche cobas c502 and Siemens Atellica) and one dry chemistry platform (Ortho Vitros 4600). For each study site, vendor purchases during the calendar year 2022 were used to calculate annual consumable consumption for materials required for a BMP. Consumable waste was defined as any quality control (QC), calibrator, reagent, dry slides, package insert paperwork and associated packaging material required for the analysis of the BMP and were separated into plastic, cardboard, paper, glass, and rubber solid waste categories. Each of these components were weighed separately. To account for à la carte, comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) and other panel orderings, a correction factor (45%) was applied across all reagent consumables. The projected solid waste for 1 million BMPs was estimated for each study site. Results The total amount of waste generated from 1 million BMPs across the four sites using wet chemistry platforms was 3337 kg and 160593 kg for the dry chemistry platform. Total estimated solid waste for the wet chemistry analyzer systems (n=4) to perform 1 million BMPs were 995 kg, 1274.4 kg, 579.2 kg and 488.6 kg out of which 298 kg, 379 kg, 163.3 kg, and 60 kg accounted for QC waste processes on the Abbott Alinity, Beckman AU5800, Roche cobas c502 and Siemens Atellica automated analyzers, respectively (Figure A). Similarly, total waste generation for the dry chemistry analyzer (Ortho Vitros 4600) for 1 million BMPs was estimated to be 160593 kg, which included 160.5 kg for QC materials (Figure B). Variations in QC practices (2 vs 3 levels) as well as conventional and tube-based QC materials used were noted at each site. Conclusion Analysis of BMPs generates enormous amounts of solid waste across major diagnostic platforms. These findings emphasize the urgent need for recycling and waste-reduction strategies in diagnostic laboratories to reduce their environmental footprint.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.196
Primary Topic
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A-202 A multisite analysis of solid waste generation from 1 million basic metabolic panels

Khushbu Patel, Joe Wiencek, Christopher W Farnsworth, Kwaku Twum et al.
Clinical Chemistry
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
article

A-202 A multisite analysis of solid waste generation from 1 million basic metabolic panels

Khushbu Patel, Joe Wiencek, Christopher W Farnsworth, Kwaku Twum, Yaqing Du, Raeshun T Glover, Steven W. Cotten, William J. Butler, Christina C. Pierre, Robert M. Brackbill, Erving T Laryea, Seema Khattri Bhandari
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical laboratory operations generate large amounts of waste despite several initiatives for implementation of sustainable practices in laboratory medicine. The basic metabolic panel (BMP) is one of the most routinely performed tests in clinical chemistry. This study evaluated identifiable waste generated to perform BMPs across major chemistry analyzer platforms for a period of one year and estimated the waste that would be produced for running 1 million BMPs. Methods Measurements for readily identifiable consumable waste for BMPs were performed across five academic medical centers encompassing four different wet chemistry platforms (Abbott Alinity, Beckman AU5800, Roche cobas c502 and Siemens Atellica) and one dry chemistry platform (Ortho Vitros 4600). For each study site, vendor purchases during the calendar year 2022 were used to calculate annual consumable consumption for materials required for a BMP. Consumable waste was defined as any quality control (QC), calibrator, reagent, dry slides, package insert paperwork and associated packaging material required for the analysis of the BMP and were separated into plastic, cardboard, paper, glass, and rubber solid waste categories. Each of these components were weighed separately. To account for à la carte, comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) and other panel orderings, a correction factor (45%) was applied across all reagent consumables. The projected solid waste for 1 million BMPs was estimated for each study site. Results The total amount of waste generated from 1 million BMPs across the four sites using wet chemistry platforms was 3337 kg and 160593 kg for the dry chemistry platform. Total estimated solid waste for the wet chemistry analyzer systems (n=4) to perform 1 million BMPs were 995 kg, 1274.4 kg, 579.2 kg and 488.6 kg out of which 298 kg, 379 kg, 163.3 kg, and 60 kg accounted for QC waste processes on the Abbott Alinity, Beckman AU5800, Roche cobas c502 and Siemens Atellica automated analyzers, respectively (Figure A). Similarly, total waste generation for the dry chemistry analyzer (Ortho Vitros 4600) for 1 million BMPs was estimated to be 160593 kg, which included 160.5 kg for QC materials (Figure B). Variations in QC practices (2 vs 3 levels) as well as conventional and tube-based QC materials used were noted at each site. Conclusion Analysis of BMPs generates enormous amounts of solid waste across major diagnostic platforms. These findings emphasize the urgent need for recycling and waste-reduction strategies in diagnostic laboratories to reduce their environmental footprint.

Clinical ChemistryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Apex School of Theology (US), University of Virginia (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.