B-053 Investigation of Discrepant Alkaline Phosphatase Results on the Roche Cobas Pro Instrument

Abstract Background A high frequency of Roche Cobas delta check instrument errors for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) led to the discovery of non-reproducible and spurious ALP results in a tertiary care hospital. A series of studies were subsequently performed on different Roche instruments at multiple hospital laboratories across Alberta, Canada, to determine the root cause and develop workflow mitigation strategies. Methods Three studies were implemented across different hospital laboratories to quantify frequency and identify cause of ALP fliers. ALP was measured on the Roche Cobas Pro c503 at 12 sites and on Roche Cobas 8000 c702 at 1 site. Replicates that exceeded the total allowable error (TAE) of =150 U/L ± 15 U/L or >150 U/L ± 10% were considered discrepant. Firstly, ALP samples run in duplicate and those exceeding the TAE were aliquoted, respun and reanalyzed in for 1-9 months. In the second study, ALP collections in BD Vacutainer plasma separator tubes (PST) were switched to BD Vacutainer Barricor tubes, which produce cleaner plasma, and run in duplicate for 1 month. Lastly, ALP was diluted (5x) and analyzed in duplicate. If TAE was exceeded then neat samples were aliquoted, respun and rerun. Results The first phase identified 563 ALP repeats outside the TAE across the Pro sites but none on the 8000. Frequency of spurious results varied at sites and ranged from 0.3-12/week and 0.04-1.5% of total ALP testing volumes. Initial duplicate comparisons had an overall mean difference (standard deviation, SD) of 15.1% (38.2%), and difference range of -85 to 270% across sites. Respinning significantly improved comparison results, with the percent mean (SD) decreasing to 0.3% (3.2%) and a narrower difference range of -13.5 to 41%. Barricor tubes reduced overall ALP flier rate by 72% and 5x dilutions reduced them by 89%. Conclusion Clinically significant ALP discrepancies were identified on multiple Roche Cobas Pro instrument across a large provincial laboratory network. These fliers were not observed on the Roche Cobas 8000, and were largely eliminated after respinning, dilution, and use of Barricor tubes, suggesting a preanalytical cause. This also suggests that the Pros may be more prone to interference from plasma contaminants. An automated workflow protocol involving a combination of onboard dilution of all ALP samples with respin only if TAE is exceeded was developed as a cost-effective and streamlined approach to minimize these errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.451
Primary Topic
Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B-053 Investigation of Discrepant Alkaline Phosphatase Results on the Roche Cobas Pro Instrument

Keri Niemann, Allison A. Venner, Yury Butorin, Karin Moses et al.
Clinical Chemistry
Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
article

B-053 Investigation of Discrepant Alkaline Phosphatase Results on the Roche Cobas Pro Instrument

Keri Niemann, Allison A. Venner, Yury Butorin, Karin Moses, Isolde Seiden Long, Josh Raizman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background A high frequency of Roche Cobas delta check instrument errors for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) led to the discovery of non-reproducible and spurious ALP results in a tertiary care hospital. A series of studies were subsequently performed on different Roche instruments at multiple hospital laboratories across Alberta, Canada, to determine the root cause and develop workflow mitigation strategies. Methods Three studies were implemented across different hospital laboratories to quantify frequency and identify cause of ALP fliers. ALP was measured on the Roche Cobas Pro c503 at 12 sites and on Roche Cobas 8000 c702 at 1 site. Replicates that exceeded the total allowable error (TAE) of =150 U/L ± 15 U/L or >150 U/L ± 10% were considered discrepant. Firstly, ALP samples run in duplicate and those exceeding the TAE were aliquoted, respun and reanalyzed in for 1-9 months. In the second study, ALP collections in BD Vacutainer plasma separator tubes (PST) were switched to BD Vacutainer Barricor tubes, which produce cleaner plasma, and run in duplicate for 1 month. Lastly, ALP was diluted (5x) and analyzed in duplicate. If TAE was exceeded then neat samples were aliquoted, respun and rerun. Results The first phase identified 563 ALP repeats outside the TAE across the Pro sites but none on the 8000. Frequency of spurious results varied at sites and ranged from 0.3-12/week and 0.04-1.5% of total ALP testing volumes. Initial duplicate comparisons had an overall mean difference (standard deviation, SD) of 15.1% (38.2%), and difference range of -85 to 270% across sites. Respinning significantly improved comparison results, with the percent mean (SD) decreasing to 0.3% (3.2%) and a narrower difference range of -13.5 to 41%. Barricor tubes reduced overall ALP flier rate by 72% and 5x dilutions reduced them by 89%. Conclusion Clinically significant ALP discrepancies were identified on multiple Roche Cobas Pro instrument across a large provincial laboratory network. These fliers were not observed on the Roche Cobas 8000, and were largely eliminated after respinning, dilution, and use of Barricor tubes, suggesting a preanalytical cause. This also suggests that the Pros may be more prone to interference from plasma contaminants. An automated workflow protocol involving a combination of onboard dilution of all ALP samples with respin only if TAE is exceeded was developed as a cost-effective and streamlined approach to minimize these errors.

Clinical ChemistryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Red Deer Polytechnic (CA), Calgary Laboratory Services (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.