A Sensitivity Assessment Framework for Frequency Ratio-Based Landslide Susceptibility Models: Evaluating the Role of Data Classification and Zonation

Landslide Susceptibility (LS) maps are essential tools for hazard assessment, yet the reliability of such maps is highly sensitive to methodological choices in data classification and discretisation. Although Frequency Ratio (FR) modelling is widely applied in LS assessments, limited research has systematically evaluated how the selection of classification techniques and classification schemes affects the accuracy and zoning of Landslide Susceptibility Index (LSI) outputs. This study proposes a sensitivity assessment framework that analyses the influence of four standard classification methods Natural Breaks, Quantile, Geometrical, and Equal Intervals under varying classification levels (4, 6, and 8 classes) on Frequency ratio-based LS modelling. Applied to two landslide-prone regions in Brunei Darussalam, the framework reveals that classification choices significantly alter predictive performance, map zoning, and model Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-Area Under the Curve (AUC) rates (AUC=88%–97.7%). Of the 12 scheme–class-count combinations tested, a Geometrical-interval scheme with six classes gave the highest AUC (97.7 %) in the Kota Batu–Subok study areas, while a Quantile scheme with six classes was best for Jangsak–Tutong (AUC = 94.6 %). The framework is demonstrated on two rainfall-triggered hillslope study areas near Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam: Jalan Kota Batu–Subok (≈ 53 km²; 134 mapped debris-fall events) and Jalan Jangsak–Tutong (≈ 41 km²; 115 events), where steep sandstone–shale terrain and intense monsoon downpours routinely initiate shallow slides. We further show that varying classification can distort susceptibility zoning, potentially leading to misinformed risk decisions. These findings underscore the critical need for further investigation of classification methods in landslide modelling workflows and provide a reproducible method to reduce model uncertainty. Reproducibility is achieved through shareable ArcGIS ModelBuilder scripts and companion Excel templates that automate factor re-classification, frequency-ratio weighting, and fixed-seed validation, enabling any user with standard ArcGIS and Excel to recreate the maps and uncertainty metrics. The frequency-ratio probability maps allow planners to set evidence-based no-build buffers, rank slopes for stabilization works, and calibrate local rainfall-threshold warning systems, directly linking the research to real-world hazard mitigation.  

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geoinformatics
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52939/ijg.v21i9.4441
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Sensitivity Assessment Framework for Frequency Ratio-Based Landslide Susceptibility Models: Evaluating the Role of Data Classification and Zonation

International Journal of Geoinformatics
Landslides and related hazards
article

A Sensitivity Assessment Framework for Frequency Ratio-Based Landslide Susceptibility Models: Evaluating the Role of Data Classification and Zonation

article en

Abstract

Landslide Susceptibility (LS) maps are essential tools for hazard assessment, yet the reliability of such maps is highly sensitive to methodological choices in data classification and discretisation. Although Frequency Ratio (FR) modelling is widely applied in LS assessments, limited research has systematically evaluated how the selection of classification techniques and classification schemes affects the accuracy and zoning of Landslide Susceptibility Index (LSI) outputs. This study proposes a sensitivity assessment framework that analyses the influence of four standard classification methods Natural Breaks, Quantile, Geometrical, and Equal Intervals under varying classification levels (4, 6, and 8 classes) on Frequency ratio-based LS modelling. Applied to two landslide-prone regions in Brunei Darussalam, the framework reveals that classification choices significantly alter predictive performance, map zoning, and model Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-Area Under the Curve (AUC) rates (AUC=88%–97.7%). Of the 12 scheme–class-count combinations tested, a Geometrical-interval scheme with six classes gave the highest AUC (97.7 %) in the Kota Batu–Subok study areas, while a Quantile scheme with six classes was best for Jangsak–Tutong (AUC = 94.6 %). The framework is demonstrated on two rainfall-triggered hillslope study areas near Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam: Jalan Kota Batu–Subok (≈ 53 km²; 134 mapped debris-fall events) and Jalan Jangsak–Tutong (≈ 41 km²; 115 events), where steep sandstone–shale terrain and intense monsoon downpours routinely initiate shallow slides. We further show that varying classification can distort susceptibility zoning, potentially leading to misinformed risk decisions. These findings underscore the critical need for further investigation of classification methods in landslide modelling workflows and provide a reproducible method to reduce model uncertainty. Reproducibility is achieved through shareable ArcGIS ModelBuilder scripts and companion Excel templates that automate factor re-classification, frequency-ratio weighting, and fixed-seed validation, enabling any user with standard ArcGIS and Excel to recreate the maps and uncertainty metrics. The frequency-ratio probability maps allow planners to set evidence-based no-build buffers, rank slopes for stabilization works, and calibrate local rainfall-threshold warning systems, directly linking the research to real-world hazard mitigation.  

International Journal of Geoinformatics
Universiti Teknologi Brunei (BN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.