OpenGRF: prediction of ground reaction forces and moments during activities of daily living using OpenSim

Abstract Background and Objectives Ground reaction forces and moments (GRF&Ms), typically measured using force plates, are key inputs for musculoskeletal simulations. OpenSim currently lacks a tool to predict GRF&Ms directly from kinematics. This study presents OpenGRF, an OpenSim-based tool designed to estimate GRF&Ms and the centre of pressure (CoP) from joint kinematic data and validates its performance against force plate recordings. Methods The proposed methodology integrates calibrated foot–ground contact probes with an optimization framework based on computed muscle control, while CoP is computed accounting for both kinematic and dynamic contributions. For validation, a scaled FullBodyModel (37-DoF without muscles) was created for seven healthy adults performing six trials each of level walking, stair ascent, and stair descent, for a total of 126 marker-based trials. GRF&Ms predictions were compared to reference force plate data using normalized RMSE (nRMSE), Pearson correlation coefficients (ρ), CoP error, and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) Results Results showed high accuracy for vertical GRF (nRMSE ≤1.5%, ρ ≥0.94), particularly during level walking, and good accuracy for anterior–posterior GRF (nRMSE 4.4–6.1%, ρ = 0.81–0.91). Medio–lateral GRF was less reliable, especially in stair tasks (nRMSE up to 11.2%, ρ down to 0.48). Free moments were the most challenging quantity to predict across all tasks (nRMSE up to 28%). In contrast, ankle moments were predicted with high fidelity (nRMSE ≈1.7%, ρ ≈0.98). Median CoP errors were 21–23 mm, with largest discrepancies during double support. Conclusions OpenGRF enables physics-consistent estimation of GRF&Ms and CoP directly from kinematics, achieving the highest accuracy for vertical GRFs and predicting ankle moments that closely match those obtained from force plate measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2026.0264
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OpenGRF: prediction of ground reaction forces and moments during activities of daily living using OpenSim

Luca Modenese, Francesca Di Puccio, Andrea Di Pietro
5 citations
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
7.80
article

OpenGRF: prediction of ground reaction forces and moments during activities of daily living using OpenSim

Luca Modenese, Francesca Di Puccio, Andrea Di Pietro
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives Ground reaction forces and moments (GRF&Ms), typically measured using force plates, are key inputs for musculoskeletal simulations. OpenSim currently lacks a tool to predict GRF&Ms directly from kinematics. This study presents OpenGRF, an OpenSim-based tool designed to estimate GRF&Ms and the centre of pressure (CoP) from joint kinematic data and validates its performance against force plate recordings. Methods The proposed methodology integrates calibrated foot–ground contact probes with an optimization framework based on computed muscle control, while CoP is computed accounting for both kinematic and dynamic contributions. For validation, a scaled FullBodyModel (37-DoF without muscles) was created for seven healthy adults performing six trials each of level walking, stair ascent, and stair descent, for a total of 126 marker-based trials. GRF&Ms predictions were compared to reference force plate data using normalized RMSE (nRMSE), Pearson correlation coefficients (ρ), CoP error, and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) Results Results showed high accuracy for vertical GRF (nRMSE ≤1.5%, ρ ≥0.94), particularly during level walking, and good accuracy for anterior–posterior GRF (nRMSE 4.4–6.1%, ρ = 0.81–0.91). Medio–lateral GRF was less reliable, especially in stair tasks (nRMSE up to 11.2%, ρ down to 0.48). Free moments were the most challenging quantity to predict across all tasks (nRMSE up to 28%). In contrast, ankle moments were predicted with high fidelity (nRMSE ≈1.7%, ρ ≈0.98). Median CoP errors were 21–23 mm, with largest discrepancies during double support. Conclusions OpenGRF enables physics-consistent estimation of GRF&Ms and CoP directly from kinematics, achieving the highest accuracy for vertical GRFs and predicting ankle moments that closely match those obtained from force plate measurements.

Journal of The Royal Society InterfaceVol. 23(244)
University of Pisa (IT), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
7.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon