Creative or uncreative partner: Comparing humans and AI in collaborative creative tasks

{":":[0],"Creativity":[1],"is":[2,95],"fundamentally":[3],"a":[4],"collaborative":[5,140,183],"process.":[6,83],"As":[7],"generative":[8,149],"AI":[9,101,110,150,179],"becomes":[10,21],"increasingly":[11],"integrated":[12],"into":[13],"creative":[14,35,43,82,93,116,173,184],"work,":[15],"understanding":[16],"how":[17,77],"it":[18],"reshapes":[19],"collaboration":[20,31,94,108,124],"critical.":[22],"This":[23],"pre-registered":[24],"study":[25],"directly":[26],"compares":[27],"human-human":[28,55,120,134,165],"and":[29,42,182],"human-AI":[30,61,123],"dynamics":[32],"across":[33],"two":[34],"tasks:":[36],"the":[37,81,88,160],"Alternate":[38],"Uses":[39],"Task":[40],"(AUT)":[41],"short":[44],"story":[45],"writing.":[46],"Participants":[47],"were":[48],"randomly":[49],"assigned":[50],"to":[51,75,119,126,133],"pairs":[52],"in":[53,92],"either":[54],"(N":[56],"=":[57,64],"68":[58],"pairs)":[59,66],"or":[60,130],"(GPT-4o;":[62],"N":[63],"72":[65],"conditions,":[67],"with":[68,109,122,175],"partners":[69,111,137],"alternating":[70],"turns":[71],"as":[72],"first":[73],"responders":[74],"examine":[76],"initiation":[78],"order":[79],"shapes":[80],"Our":[84],"findings":[85],"reveal":[86],"that":[87,142,147],"apparent":[89],"\\"AI":[90],"advantage\\"":[91],"illusory,":[96],"driven":[97],"primarily":[98],"by":[99],"increased":[100],"verbosity":[102],"rather":[103],"than":[104],"enhanced":[105],"creativity.":[106],"Critically,":[107],"negatively":[112],"impacted":[113],"humans'":[114],"own":[115],"responses":[117],"compared":[118],"partnerships,":[121],"failing":[125],"enhance":[127],"idea":[128],"originality":[129],"diversity":[131],"relative":[132],"collaboration.":[135,166],"Human":[136],"demonstrated":[138],"higher":[139],"creativity":[141,162],"strengthened":[143],"over":[144],"time,":[145],"indicating":[146],"current":[148],"systems,":[151],"while":[152],"producing":[153],"more":[154],"verbose":[155],"outputs,":[156],"do":[157],"not":[158],"replicate":[159],"collective":[161],"characteristic":[163],"of":[164],"These":[167],"results":[168],"challenge":[169],"assumptions":[170],"about":[171],"AI’s":[172],"potential,":[174],"direct":[176],"implications":[177],"for":[178],"system":[180],"design":[181],"practice.":[185]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2026.109172
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Creative or uncreative partner: Comparing humans and AI in collaborative creative tasks

Nina Lauharatanahirun, Simone A Luchini, Roger E. Beaty, Clin KY Lai
1 citations
Computers in Human Behavior
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
9.26
article

Creative or uncreative partner: Comparing humans and AI in collaborative creative tasks

Nina Lauharatanahirun, Simone A Luchini, Roger E. Beaty, Clin KY Lai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

: Creativity is fundamentally a collaborative process. As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into creative work, understanding how it reshapes collaboration becomes critical. This pre-registered study directly compares human-human and human-AI collaboration dynamics across two creative tasks: the Alternate Uses Task (AUT) and creative short story writing. Participants were randomly assigned to pairs in either human-human (N = 68 pairs) or human-AI (GPT-4o; N = 72 pairs) conditions, with partners alternating turns as first responders to examine how initiation order shapes the creative process. Our findings reveal that the apparent "AI advantage" in creative collaboration is illusory, driven primarily by increased AI verbosity rather than enhanced creativity. Critically, collaboration with AI partners negatively impacted humans' own creative responses compared to human-human partnerships, with human-AI collaboration failing to enhance idea originality or diversity relative to human-human collaboration. Human partners demonstrated higher collaborative creativity that strengthened over time, indicating that current generative AI systems, while producing more verbose outputs, do not replicate the collective creativity characteristic of human-human collaboration. These results challenge assumptions about AI’s creative potential, with direct implications for AI system design and collaborative creative practice.

Computers in Human BehaviorVol. 187
Pennsylvania State University (US), Fischer (Germany) (DE)
Amazon, National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
9.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.