Phenomenological Hermeneutic Study on the Epistemological Obstacles of High School Students in Solving Combinatorics Problems

This study employs a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to explore students' epistemological obstacles in solving permutation and combination problems, with the goal of supporting the development of more effective teaching materials. The research involved 24 12th-grade high school students (14 males and 10 females) and used qualitative methods. Data were collected through five diagnostic essay questions and semi-structured interviews to identify epistemological obstacles in combinatorics. Students’ written responses and interview transcripts were analyzed and interpreted to uncover the underlying obstacles. The findings revealed several epistemological obstacles: (1) students were unable to identify all possible answers from a given problem; (2) students could not differentiate between problems requiring the concept of permutation and those requiring the concept of combination; (3) students struggled to solve problems that differed from the example problems provided; and (4) challenges in formulating a complete solution when faced with multiple conditions, despite being able to calculate partial results. These insights suggest that teachers and future researchers should consider students' epistemological obstacles when designing instructional materials, particularly for topics in combinatorics such as permutations and combinations. Developing learning resources based on these findings may enhance conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills among students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v15i1.468
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phenomenological Hermeneutic Study on the Epistemological Obstacles of High School Students in Solving Combinatorics Problems

Nia Kania, Sri Asnawati, Tri Nopriana
Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
Educational Research and Pedagogy
article

Phenomenological Hermeneutic Study on the Epistemological Obstacles of High School Students in Solving Combinatorics Problems

Nia Kania, Sri Asnawati, Tri Nopriana
article en

Abstract

This study employs a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to explore students' epistemological obstacles in solving permutation and combination problems, with the goal of supporting the development of more effective teaching materials. The research involved 24 12th-grade high school students (14 males and 10 females) and used qualitative methods. Data were collected through five diagnostic essay questions and semi-structured interviews to identify epistemological obstacles in combinatorics. Students’ written responses and interview transcripts were analyzed and interpreted to uncover the underlying obstacles. The findings revealed several epistemological obstacles: (1) students were unable to identify all possible answers from a given problem; (2) students could not differentiate between problems requiring the concept of permutation and those requiring the concept of combination; (3) students struggled to solve problems that differed from the example problems provided; and (4) challenges in formulating a complete solution when faced with multiple conditions, despite being able to calculate partial results. These insights suggest that teachers and future researchers should consider students' epistemological obstacles when designing instructional materials, particularly for topics in combinatorics such as permutations and combinations. Developing learning resources based on these findings may enhance conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills among students.

Southeast Asian Mathematics Education JournalVol. 15(1)
Universitas Majalengka (ID), Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.